English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1 opening up of the red sea

2 angels giving devine messages to Muhommed

what do you think?

2006-12-17 21:39:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

Like the others said, it's the "Sea of Reed" which was a reed ridden swamp and no miracle., just common sense, since chariots wouldn't be able to navigate in there.

Mohammad and 2 Angels?

That illiterate could only claim that the Archangel Gabriel [Jibrail, to you Dubai-ites] gave him all the stuff and everybody know that that old fart was a liar!?

Merry Crimbo!!!!

2006-12-18 14:45:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Opening up the red sea, Yes, The 2 angels giving mohammed devine messages, no.

2006-12-18 05:42:43 · answer #2 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 3 2

Contrary to popular belief, the Bible does not describe a dramatic parting of the Red Sea like you see in the movies. The text tells us that a strong wind from the east blew all night, and in the morning there was a path of dry land. Also, it wasn't the Red Sea, it was the Sea of Reeds, which was more like a shallow swamp.

2006-12-18 05:42:53 · answer #3 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0 0

The first is an ancient mistraslation of the words "reed sea" which is in the delta of Egypt (chariots would bog down there while people on foot could walk through).
As for angels, that's up to your own faith in any religion.

2006-12-18 05:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Isis 7 · 0 0

Well you doing well if you just find 2 things hard to believe in life

2006-12-18 05:51:02 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Hex Vision 7 · 0 0

i have no problem believing either.
i've seen demons come out in the name of Jesus.

i've also seen bottled demons fleeing when the bottles were broke.

you find it difficult because your yet to have an encounter with the supernatural realm

2006-12-18 05:54:40 · answer #6 · answered by chris_muriel007 4 · 1 0

the Red Sea i can understand
but why just Mohamed ? why not every prophet ?
surely one is as believable or unbelievable as the next ?

2006-12-18 05:42:51 · answer #7 · answered by Peace 7 · 2 0

Agree with Sakura 100%

It's symbolism, stop taking it literally.

2006-12-18 05:43:51 · answer #8 · answered by π² 4 · 0 1

2 angels?? it was only GABRIELLE (jibrail in Arabic)....
gosh it doesnt seem that u were EVER a muslim

2006-12-18 06:12:47 · answer #9 · answered by Apple 4 · 0 0

It's a symbolism. It was only used way to say something.

2006-12-18 05:42:09 · answer #10 · answered by Sakura 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers