This is a mathematical inconsistency since there are 2 negatives involved.
1. does not exist (-ve 1)
2. proof of non-existence (-ve 2)
when you prove the non-existence of something that
does not exist, it makes a positive.
BOTTOMLINE: God EXISTS
ha ha ha
Merry christmas!!!!!!!
2006-12-17 18:51:30 · 17 answers · asked by chris_muriel007 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They say that proof is in the pudding ;)
2006-12-17 18:54:22 · answer #1 · answered by DREAMER 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've got it backwards. If you claim that something exists, simply provide proof. If you go into a court of law and make a claim that something exists and don't supply proof, the judge will throw you out on your behind. Religious people just make themselves look ridiculous by saying, "Prove that God doesn't exist". Stop making yourself look bad, but supply proof and you'll look good.
2006-12-17 20:16:15 · answer #2 · answered by The professor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
O.K - how do YOU prove the existence - mathematically or otherwise - of a god you presumes exists, WITHOUT using the bible?
Note, atheists have nothing to prove, anymore than you do. It is a BELIEF, same as yours.
Atheists just choose to believe there are no gods, and you choose to believe in the one you do.
Chew on that a while and Merry hristmas to you too.
2006-12-17 18:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No men can prove anything for God or against God.
Along history, there had been quarrels and confrontations among various groups of people; the results are not the backwardness of all mankind, but it is the mighty advancement. Men can visit the moon and they will be able to discover the mystery of farther stars and planets.
The right way that mankind have chosen is not the quarrelling, but the learning to attain greater knowledge. There are the making of weapons and also the building of academic institutions; and now these rational institutions have reached the digital and virtual position that no weapons can destroy.
2006-12-17 19:09:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why is it that everyone thinks they have something to prove when it comes to religion! Don't you see? The more you try to push your beliefs off on others, the farther away you will chase them! I don't know any Athiests that go around badgering people, trying to prove the non-existance of God. But everywhere you look someone is going on about how God exists and this and that...Believe it or not I am actually a Christian. But I am Gnostic and I don't believe in trying to force others into believing in something just because you feel it's right. My brother is an Athiest and I am fine with that because that is who he is and what he feels is right. Will that always feel right to him? Who knows. Things change and feelings change. But who am I to force this change?
2006-12-17 19:03:41 · answer #5 · answered by Mystique6583 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
your logic is flawed in the extreme you are working it backwards logic states that if A is = to B then surely B has to = A so if we assume that god does exist then G = infinity but to do this you must first state your proof of existence since proof is = to 0 and god is = to infinity then you are stating that 0 = infinity therefore disproving your own proof !
2006-12-17 19:07:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Semantics is fun 4 u n me.
Yeah, with that little fomula, you just proved that Invisible Space Monkeys control the earths weather patterns. And you can prove that flying turds exist and a great many other things. Congrats! Ain't it fun to be clever?
2006-12-17 18:55:25 · answer #7 · answered by Black Parade Billie 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
when you prove the non-existence of something that
does not exist, it makes a positive.
No, it only makes the statement postive only. its what is called a postive negative. Proofing that he does exist trying to find out that he does not would be a negative negatice.
2006-12-17 19:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by Mr Hex Vision 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The burden of proof is on us, not the atheists.
The one who asserts an idea has the burden of proof, not the challenger of the idea.
Saying that something exists because there is no proof that it does not exist is also another logical fallacy. Please consider learning logic before trying to apply it
2006-12-17 19:06:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
there is not any historic data that zeus replaced right into a residing being. there have been no eyewitnesses , no funds depicting his likeness , no tangible data. products of the christian puzzle are nonetheless being stumbled on as a lot as on the present time. actual written data that activities as foretold interior the bible extremely did ensue, human beings said interior the bible extremely existed. regrettably for zeusophiles, there is not some thing except fantasy. if zeus replaced into the authentic residing god why do not human beings as we talk save on with him and provides you their existence to save on with him. if zeus is the single then why are there not large houses of worship in honor of zeus crammed with straightforward followers as we talk?
2016-11-30 22:01:59 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you prove Flying Spaghetti Monster does not exist?
If not FSM exists
Worship him instead of God
2006-12-17 19:25:08 · answer #11 · answered by The atheist revolutionary 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋