English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The couple lives in Michigan. The husband is contemplating moving to Illinois to accept a job that would require him to live in Chicago. His wife would continue to live in Michigan. Therefore, they would have to file separate individual tax returns instead of a joint return. All other things being the same, would they have to pay more taxes in total because of having to file separate returns?

2006-12-17 13:56:49 · 7 answers · asked by freelance thinker 2 in Business & Finance Taxes United States

7 answers

Well, the federal return wouldn't need to be a separate filing from his wife's just because they live separately. They might have some state issues because Michigan's going to want to tax his Illinois earning by treating him as a resident (his family still lives there, his big home is there and his condo is in Illinois (presumably)), and Illinois will definitely tax his money earned in Illinois whether he lives there or not, and will want to tax his worldwide income (including for example, interest and dividends earned from a Michigan bank) if he lives there. If the tax rates (counting city taxes if applicable) in Illinois and Michigan are the same or close, he won't pay more tax, because all states allow a credit against their tax for taxes paid to another state.

He really should talk to a tax adviser directly if he wants to make sure he gets this right. There can be nuances here that won't be addressed adequately in this forum.

2006-12-17 14:36:46 · answer #1 · answered by Rose 2 · 2 0

To file jointly you need not live together provided you are legally married.

If your individual taxable incomes are approximately the same your total income tax will probably be just about the same filing either jointly or separately. However, if there is a fairly large difference in your individual incomes it generally results in lower total taxes if you file jointly.

To pay the least income tax you would want to prepare your tax returns both ways and compare the results.

State income taxes are a different matter. You will have to file tax returns in each state. Again, you file joint state returns if you are filing federal joint returns. It does not matter who earns the income.

However, this can be complicated as adjoining states sometimes have offsetting charges and credits for income earned in another state. You should consult a tax advisor in Michigan and/or Illinois about this. You might find that there would be a big enough advantage in filing separate state returns that you would also want to file separate federal returns.

2006-12-17 15:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by Latigo 3 · 0 0

They can still file a joint return. Filing separately almost always results in paying MORE tax. The only way separate returns help is if one person has, for example, a lot of medical expense--in which case only one income is subject to the 7½ % reduction to the medical expense. There are a few other situations in which separate returns would help, but generally it does not help to file separately. The only way to tell for sure is to calculate the tax both ways and see if the two separate returns result in more or less tax.

2006-12-17 14:56:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No you would not have to file separate tax returns, and no you will not have to pay more unless the tax rate for the state of Illinois is higher than Michigan. You will still file one return, you may file married filing sep, but it won't help or hurt you in any way.

2006-12-17 14:09:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Just because you're not living together doesn't mean you can't file a joint federal return - assuming you're still married, you can still file jointly.

Filing as married filing separately instead of joint generally costs you more.

State filings would depend on state law.

2006-12-17 15:31:45 · answer #5 · answered by Judy 7 · 1 0

a million. no longer all persons who filed have been entitled to a verify. the government never suggested that all and sundry persons who filed have been entitled to a verify. If everyone did say that, it grow to be BS by using whomever suggested it, no longer the government. 2. The rebate grow to be consistently in easy terms for persons who the two (a) people who claimed somebody sixteen or youthful, or (b) people who might desire to no longer be claimed as a based by using the different guy or woman. the government isn't thinking her a criminal grownup. they are in easy terms thinking her somebody older than sixteen, which she is. There are diverse age minimums for extremely some issues; a 17-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous can stress in lots of states and a 20-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous won't be able to purchase alcohol. Being a criminal grownup would not confer all rights of 40-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-olds and being a minor would not confer all financial reward of being a million-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous. 3. No, you won't be able to report her very own "grownup" return. First, there isn't any such element as an "grownup" return. 2nd, and greater importantly, she would not be eligible for a rebate, via fact which you'll be able to desire to declare her, which made her ineligible for a rebate, despite if or no longer you probably did declare her. returned, the rebate grow to be in easy terms for those persons whom no person else might desire to declare.

2016-12-15 03:17:39 · answer #6 · answered by lacy 4 · 0 0

I believe that is true... You would probably have to pay a little more because you are filing seperate.. Try claiming kids or donating to knock down taxes..good luck..!

2006-12-17 14:05:42 · answer #7 · answered by happy2BAlive!! 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers