2006-12-17 11:25:14 · 15 answers · asked by kooool_aid123 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Miranda Rights
The case against Miranda was lost due to lack of rights explained to him. This brought fourth the case of
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Mr. Miranda was not informed of his rights when he was arrested. Therefore, claimed he lacked the knowledge of "self incrimination" which is provided to us all within the U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment.
Because of this the case the people had against Mr. Miranda was lost because any evidence given under these circumstances is not permitted to be used against the accused. This would include any confessions, admissions... etc...
2006-12-17 11:40:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miranda Rights
2006-12-17 13:17:54 · answer #2 · answered by jlw78418 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miranda Rights
2006-12-17 13:05:45 · answer #3 · answered by â¤??? ?å???? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miranda Rights
2006-12-17 11:27:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Miranda Rights.
2006-12-17 11:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miranda rights
2006-12-18 02:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miranda rights
2006-12-17 12:02:57 · answer #7 · answered by Sxoxo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are called Miranda rights or a Miranda warning and protect your fifth amendment rights which protect you from self incrimination. It was mandated in the 1966 Supreme Court decision, Miranda vs. Arizona.
2006-12-17 11:31:33 · answer #8 · answered by Jules 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you referring to the Miranda rights?
Those are not always dependent on just an arrest. After a person is in police custody, they are read prior to questioning about the offense charged (a custodial interrogation).
2006-12-17 11:29:27 · answer #9 · answered by jaybird512 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Miranda rights.
2006-12-17 12:01:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋