The seat of the Catholic Church [papacy] was not Rome from 1309 through 1377. Where was it?

Question

The seat of the Catholic Church [papacy] was not Rome from 1309 through 1377. Where was it?

Answer 1

Avignon, France.

Answer 2

Avignon, France

http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Vatican.html

Answer 3

Clement V took the Papal seat to Avignon, where he turned the universal church into a provincial chapel for Phillip, the King of France.....

Answer 4

Thanks to France's determination to rule the papacy, the pope were forcibly removed to Avignon. This time period is referred to as the "Babylonian Captivity".

It was during this period that a majority of the cardinals met in conclave and declared the French choice un-poped, as it were, and selected one of their own. At one short point there were 3 claimants to the Throne of Peter.

Eventually, and mostly thanks to a woman (natch!), St. Catherine of Siena, the cardinals met again, selected a pope and forced the French to behave themselves. The other claimants gave up their claims and once again Holy Mother Church got to clean up a mess made by a bunch of men! The UN-majority elected popes and their papacies were declared totally invalid.

Since then, no one nation has dared to try and control the papacy.

See, ladies, when the chips are down, God sends in the BIG guns, US!

Answer 5

Avignon, France.

Answer 6

Avignon in France

Answer 7

It was dual papacy: One pope was in Rome, the other in Avignon, France

Answer 8

Avignon, France

Ramen !

Answer 9

France.

But who really cares.
The CULT covered up POPE JOAN so why not the non continuity of the Vatican.

http://www.webspawner.com/users/click/index.html

Answer 10

<< have in comparison the catchisms against the divine observe of Yaweh and the bible wins out every time. >> i'm unsure what you mean by making use of that. The Church got here previously the Bible. The early Church became evangelized by making use of observe of mouth, no longer be scripture. The Bible is a made from the Church, written by making use of and for the Church, inspired by making use of God. you need to anticipate your individual bias in "comparing" the Catechism to the Bible...in case you have a preformed concept, then you certainly'll tend to locate it in spite of if it particularly is probably no longer there. <> i've got on no account heard any Catholic say it like that. Jesus is the single that suggested "consume my flesh and drink my blood." whilst we acquire Christ in the Eucharist it particularly is into our bodies, and into our souls...all of us understand that. No Catholic refers back to the reception of the sacred Eucharist as "taking Christ into his abdomen..." and no Catholic could be shocked to understand that Christ is on our hearts. of direction he's, it relatively is taught by making use of the Church besides. there is not any scarcity of non-Catholic Christians who sense that they have the infallible fact of their own own reading of scripture. whilst Jesus asked his disciples "who do men say that i'm" he have been given 4 incorrect solutions...and that became whilst Christ became surely walking the earth...he became between the folk and that they could no longer get it suitable. Why do human beings think of they are in a position to %. up a Bible 2000 years later and get it suitable? Did Jesus go away us a Bible or a Church? He left us a Church and by way of his Church we've Sacred custom and the Sacred observe of God.