2006-12-17 01:39:57 · 14 answers · asked by ? 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
LOL
2006-12-17 01:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by jonathan x 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never watched the remake. Remakes tend to SUCK. Same thing with ROLLERBALL.
Now if you want to talk about the ORIGINAL series of movies, THEY had a good plot line until the end....
Read the book and watch the ORIGINALS and find out what was really said.
Spaceballs said the message better than ALL of the POTA movies....
Ape #1: Dear me, what are those things coming out of her nose?
Ape #2: [looking in binoculars] SPACEBALLS?
Ape #1: Oh s**t! There goes the planet.
2006-12-17 02:17:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, sad... You really fear the fact that you're a type of primate.
Sorry, but of the two primates in the film, I tend to root for the human primate. I also root for the human vertibrates in Jurassic Park. I can't think of any movies at the moment where lions or something chases people, but I would root for the human mammal in those films.
2006-12-17 01:50:20 · answer #3 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please do not use a fictional movie to question atheists. Besides, monkeys and apes are different, so at least get the facts straight before they think all Creationists are idiots.
God Bless and Merry Christmas.
2006-12-17 01:49:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those simians are not monkeys anymore then a goldfish is a shark.
I didn't like the movie and so I rooted for neither side.
2006-12-17 01:45:01 · answer #5 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They're apes, not monkeys, and definitely not monkey's.
Pluralization does not involve apostrophes.
You're probably a fan of superhero movies, since you worship a fictional omnipotent being.
2006-12-17 01:49:06 · answer #6 · answered by eldad9 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
determining to kill off human beings we believe to no longer be worth to society will no longer be logical in any respect. At what aspect do you opt for the reduce off on properly worth is? as well, the decision for common sense isn't a call for a society it extremely is equipped round a cold equation determining what to be carried out contained in the international must be carried out with maximized income to the international. as well, i am going to work out illogical arguments to each and every idea you proposed. Fro social gathering, nationalize the globe and extract elements? appears like a large thanks to hasten the pollution on the earth and destabilize the economies of the international. Kill of the unhealthiest human beings? How do you outline undesirable? Stephen Hawkins isn't very healthy yet his contributions to the international are massive. Your recommendations are not any further logical in any respect so attempting your attempt to demonize common sense received't succeed. What atheists propose by technique of common sense is undemanding reasoning in accordance with information. we glance to the claims of the international. there are a range of claims that are pretend. We reject lots of them because they don't have any foundation actual. in spite of the undeniable fact that, many human beings opt for to provide their faith a free bypass on being examined like this.
2016-11-27 00:05:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watch that ending real real close then go think about the Anannaki, who the god of the OT and the garden of eden myth was written about. Were they humans from other regions or time travelers???? The movie may be much more true than you realize.
2006-12-17 01:45:23 · answer #8 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not an atheist, but would it make a difference which species they rooted for, from an atheistic point of view?
2006-12-17 01:44:16 · answer #9 · answered by enslavementality 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the astronaughts but in the end man blew up the earth in one time line and in the next the apes liked the humans
2006-12-17 01:55:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i root for the monkeys. Getting their own back
2006-12-17 01:43:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋