Well, so far, I have not seen anybody even worse. So, my answer would be that they are indeed.
Once I had a professor, graduated on Harvard University, whom the university commissioned to interview several graduates and observe their posterior evolution in life.
One of those graduates was the president of a corporation, and, according to my professor, the graduate told my professor:
Do you know how many people in this corporation can write a letter in English ? The secretary and myself, because not even the vicepresidents can do it
2006-12-17 14:38:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Americans are not the worse at spelling their own language. I publish articles in international journals. Americans believe the Internet is not so important. We are just so busy. Over 25 percent of Americans have a college degree. And over 3 percent have a degree that is at the doctoral level. (That includes JD, MD, etc.)
2006-12-16 23:59:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
it very well could be true... i'm american and have noticed it as well. some people are just real dumb and ignorant about what they say or type and for some reason can't seem to differentiate "there, their, and they're", and some other words as well. i know they sound alike, but they're completely different words with different meanings
2006-12-16 23:59:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by c4n7_b3_ur_5up3rm4n 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I bear in suggestions Wizard magazine mentioned an analogous, years in the past :) much extra, they have been stunned how distant places readers writing to them have been used to apply a much extra maximum suitable English language than English close by audio equipment from residing house (the U. S.). i think of the reason certainly is distant places people tend to learn a variety of "genuine English" (that's what any college or direction is meant to do); an American individual lives interior an English conversing society the place the on a regular basis language is "bastardized", so as that they get used to speak that way. distant places pupils who learn English outdoors of an English conversing u . s . are by some potential "secure" by utilising that. As on your respond to Vangom: the adaptation between a phonetic and a non-phonetic language is in a phonetic language there consistently are very specific regulations approximately a thank you to spell letters or team or letters; so that's authentic in a phonetic language you are able to face an analogous letter spelled in any different case or diverse letters spelt an analogous way, yet all it quite is regulated by utilising regulations: working example in Italian "c" sound is English "ch" whilst accompanied by utilising "i" or "e" on an analogous time as have English "ok" whilst accompanied by utilising a, o, u or h; so there "c" sound have an analogous spell as "q" sound, yet there's no way an Italian speaker can spell "c" the incorrect way, when you consider that we can stick to a rule. Now in English, working example, are you able to tell me in accordance to which rule the "oo" sound in "room" and "door" are thoroughly diverse...?
2016-10-05 10:16:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by murchison 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We're pretty bad, especially the net code like prolly, shd, u, stuff like that really irritates me. I Think the Indians are a little worse than the Americans though.
2006-12-16 23:56:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by m-t-nest 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it's not true. It's your perception. How many languages do you know which would give you a basis for making this observation?
2006-12-17 06:31:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by quietwalker 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess we are. It makes me sick to say. I even have friends who don't know the their there they're, to too two difference.
That bugs me a lot, but what I most hate are the people who don't care.
I hate those people.
2006-12-17 00:59:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Morgan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wot yu on bout, me speek guod eenglis, yu carnt speel guod, me guod tolkin pierson, yu krazie........
2006-12-17 00:06:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Germans are also bad at writing german...
2006-12-17 01:04:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by tine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, deftinaley!
2006-12-16 23:56:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋