what do you think of world war three?

Question

nazis are taking controll of a large territory
do think it will happen
will there be traders or peace keepers ie america
whoes who
canada britian africa spain and latin america china japan vs the rest
and any insights
questions that i didnt ask

Answer 1

WW III will be global suicide. The definition of world war usually means the great or superpower are involved on opposite sides. It means no proxy war or regional conflict like we've seen since Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf War (or like your scenario). Total war means the use of tactical and strategic nukes, how can it not be if many believe the price for victory is never too high.

There are now more than 50,000 nuclear weapons, more than 13,000 megatons of yield, deployed in the arsenals of the United States and the Russia -- enough to obliterate a million Hiroshimas.

But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Thus, there are vastly more nuclear weapons than are needed for any plausible deterrence of a potential adversary.

The World Health Organization concludes that 1.1 billion people would be killed outright in such a nuclear war, mainly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. An additional 1.1 billion people would suffer serious injurles and radiation sickness. This would represent by far the greatest disaster in the history of the human species and, with no other adverse effects, would probably be enough to reduce at least the Northern Hemisphere to a state of prolonged agony and barbarism.

The nuclear winter that Carl Sagan spoke about would eventually spread to the Southern Hemisphere, killing all plant and animal life, and eventually mankind.

So you ask me what do i think of world war three, global suicide, there's is no other way to look at it.

Answer 2

No. WW3 is carried out. WW3 develop into the chilly conflict. it truly is been over for a lengthy time period. it is merely freshen up. Which, of direction, is area of WW 4. a twin of WW1 cleanup led into WW2, and WW2's cleanup presented about the "chilly conflict." which develop into obviously a international conflict, and thence should be seen WW3, mess united statesreceived't supply up. issues do not substitute. that is a lengthy-time period continuum, with out sparkling delineations. the historic Greeks did all this crap already, understood it, misunderstood it, and defined all of it. They understood the finished complexities of the human issue, mutually with horrendous political potential struggles. positioned on your seat belt. it truly is gonna be a wild journey.

Answer 3

I think world war 3 will start in the holy lands and Israel will win backed buy any country that has brains we can see now who the enemy of the free world is

Answer 4

I think Iraq and Afghanistan, are the first actions of that war, if the USA and British force don't abandon their aggressive politics the situation could be worse.

Answer 5

I didn't understand what was your criterias when you made the "opposite teams". Your world war sounds a joke.

Answer 6

Personally, I think it is close on the horizon.

Answer 7

I'll let you know after it starts

Answer 8

It already started next year will be Iran and THATS WHEN ALL HELL BREAK LOOSE!

Answer 9

I pray that we dont have a ww3.