Do you think leaving Earth and live on planet Mars is a bit unethical?

Question

It sounds like we really have no hope left to live peacefully on planet Earth according to some scientist.Is there any good solutions to make sure human species stick to our lovely planet and never had to make any desperate decisions by having a colony on Mars?Is it true that some scientist really do lost hope on saving our precious planet?Are they the same groups of scientist that had a lot to argue with WWF and Greenpeace activist(optimist vs pesimist)?

Answer 1

The issue of moving to another planet is more than just about Earth's unsalvagable environment. Our world population is growing too fast as people are living longer and having children at earlier and later ages. The environment can be salvaged. However, I think the changes in the environment is just doing what it would naturally do anyway. We are reverting back to an interglacial period. Men survived the ice age before, we can do it again.

Answer 2

It would be best, in my opinion, to clean up our own back yard before proceeding to mess up other planets! To colonize space would be like exploitation of indigenous peoples for their natural resouces, as in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The British thought India was a backward country and attempted to exploit and colonize it, but India was/is more advanced philosophically, culturally and spiritually than the British ever were. And now, the Vedic system of civilization promises to influence world events, and I expect the Golden Age of mankind to advemt on the planet, if not in our lifetime then in the not far future. Modern science has forgotten (or refuses to admit) the existence of God and the soul, and once the so-called leaders of the nations realize they have bitten off more than they can chew with all their wars over oil and other natural resources, the people of this earth planet will return to simple living and high thinking to usher in a great period of peace, with only the minimum occurence of wars.

Answer 3

Fist of all, that may not the way interplanetary return and forth works. You launch your motor vehicle right into a circulate orbit it relatively is an ellipse it relatively is tangential to the orbits of the two Earth and Mars. You time the launch so as that the motor vehicle reaches the orbit of Mars on the comparable time and place that Mars itself does. it relatively is an elliptical orbit it relatively is easily between the orbits of Earth and Mars, and would not come everywhere close to the sunlight. Your 2d question looks extra approximately looking a without delay line by way of area between the Earth and Mars, which in simple terms isn't useful for many reasons, maximum mandatory of it relatively is that it may require vast capacity. even nonetheless you are able to _look_ in a without delay line from Earth to Mars in simple terms approximately each and all of the time, apart from a reasonably short era whilst Mars is on the a strategies fringe of the sunlight. How close you are able to stick to Mars whilst it passes at the back of the sunlight relies upon on the in many situations occurring and site of your telescope. We mechanically watch planets bypass at the back of the sunlight with the SOHO image voltaic observatory satellite tv for pc, whilst Mars is barely out of sight for some days, if in any respect.

Answer 4

No, it is not unethical for some people to go live on Mars. There is no way we could evacuate the Earth. Europe was not evacuated after Columbus and Earth will likewise never be evacuated. I don't know any scientist who has said we cannot live peacefully on Earth; maybe you have heard distorted stories or misinterpreted somebody.

Answer 5

I wouldn't call living on Mars unethical. I would call it suicidal. Human life can not be sustained on Mars, so you would probably die fairly quickly.