Oftentimes THEY REALLY JUST GUESS whether or not it was a "professionally" done photo, unless they see watermarks, of course, or the name of a studio stamped on the back of the paper photo. They rely not on the focus but on the exposure and portrait poses and the backgrounds (fancy backdrops, studio lighting with highlights on hair or professional props...) But, it's going to get a little harder now with the popular use of digital cameras and use of PhotoShop and similar programs and digital backgrounds, since many skilled amateurs are churning out great quality images for reproduction at these popularly inexpensive places, even if many are also printing at home (which costs about the same as the commercial printing, really, and sometimes more if you ruin a few images during the printing process).
Let me tell you a funny anecdote, this happened a few years ago when my little cousin graduated from college in Florida and I visited her and took granduation photos and a few portraits. I took the exposed films to one of the large stores in a mall and came back in an hour and the clerk asked me to wait a minute. The manager was called and he came and asked me if I had taken the photos or whether they were taken by a professional. I chose not to reply. I simply informed him that there were no visible signs anywhere stating that they only processed films for amateurs. He asked me what camera brand I had and I said, "Nikon." He said, "Well, that's a professional brand!" and I pointed out to one of his displays where he had a few Nikon and Canon point and shoot cameras, and I asked, "Like those Nikons?" I crossed my arms and asked, "Are you saying that you'd sell me film but won't process and print it?" He said, "No, I didn't say that..." so I said, "Hold it, do you ask those ladies if they're professional seamstresses before they buy threads?" And he said, "Hold it, let's not get ridiculous..." and I said, "YOU're the only ridiculous one here if you're willing to sell me film but refuse ME services you render to others... and you're leaving yourself and this store open for a lawsuit..." so he went over to the clerk and grabbed the packages of processed film and photos and handed them to me. I walked out and I was in the parking lot when I realized that I hadn't paid so I went back in and called him and told him that in the confusion, I hadn't paid and he laughed, and said, "It's OK, it's on the house... for the inconvenience and for the education."
I'm STILL wondering what all of that was about...!
2006-12-16 18:46:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What do you mean by "professional?" Wal-Mart does not, as far as I know, have a Professional Photographer on duty. The stores I've been in have a lady with a Camera. Don't expect professional photos from Walmart or any similar store.
2006-12-16 13:26:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by newyorkgal71 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Legally, there is supposed to be a photographer's stamp on the back or a "print-over" in the case of digital pictures.
However, Walmart seems to be using some arbitrary decision from some low level clerk.
I constantly run into problems at Walmart with my pictures.
I found it much easier to get them printed somewhere else.
2006-12-16 13:25:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Garry H 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wal-mart trains it personnel with computer based learning modules. If the co-worker is in the least bit familiar with photography, the pictures are marked in such a way that it is obviously professional. They take no chances with the copy-right laws, if it appears to be professional, then they are mandated by the Wal-mart policy to turn down any reprint orders. You need a written release from the original photographer to have them reproduced.
2006-12-16 14:26:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by whitehairblueeyes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they judge by the poses, so it's very subjective. I say that b/c I know a person who is an amateur photographer, and when they went to have the pictures they posed themselves developed, they wouldn't do it b/c it looked too professional! Then again, I think most amateur photographers would be developing their own film anyway..
2006-12-16 13:26:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by GhostDanse 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you brought in a picture to have copied, the paper the original
is developed on has the photographers name or studio pressed into the paper. You can't see it, but when it gets processed, the name comes out.
If it's on a disc, it won't copy.
2006-12-16 13:25:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cacilia T 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
At the store in my area it is arbitrary. If I do a shoot for someone and give them a CD I'll give them a written release so they don't have problems with the clerks at the store.
2006-12-16 13:59:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by k3s793 4
·
0⤊
0⤋