We all know that a lot of evolutionists are very arrogant and act like evolution has been proved when it hasnt. Here is a good resource for refuting their claims http://www.harunyahya.com/refuted8.php
2006-12-16 11:25:53 · 17 answers · asked by hello 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Seems like I would require more solid proof than an opinion to believe that humans have only been around for 3,000 years. Like, where did the dinosaur FOSSILScome from? Normally, it takes a very very very long time for something to become fossilized. Like, say 250,000 years. I know humans aren't made of clay because forensic evidence proves that we aren't walking dirt pile golems.
2006-12-16 11:29:05 · answer #1 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We all want proof that evolution is not nonsense. Have you ever seen those scientific little movie clips about how things were many million of years ago as if they (the evolutionists) were actually there? Well, that is basically propaganda to get people to believe in something without seeing it.
Now for those who believe in creation without seeing it, it is all based on the fact of the existence of Jesus Christ , which cannot be refuted without much ridicule.
Jesus spoke of himself as being equal with God and not only that, He was God in the flesh (incarnation/nativity). Now, if we take Jesus at His word, with which He showed many convincing miraculous proofs (rising from the dead), then we must believe it when He spoke of Adam and Eve , and also Noah as being historical figures. And if that is the case then creation it is and the flood actuallly happened.
2006-12-16 20:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's difficult for us to debate a whole list of things at once. Please take the most relevant points and post them, or you will just get nonsense answers.
But just as an example, the first thing that I saw on the page was this:
"There is no scientific evidence for the claim that man evolved. What is put forward as "proof" is nothing but one-sided comment on a few fossils."
That statement is so wrong that it can be classified as ignorant. A few fossils? There must be tens of thousands. One-sided comment? How about years of research through scientific enquiry (as opposed to blind faith)
2006-12-17 03:05:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is nonsense-you are correct. And for your link-it is mostly correct. I do not agree with the time frame, or Islam, but I do agree with the rest. I think your man here is a 'old-earth' creationist, and that is not all bad. I just believe in the young earth theory. But, your man has done an excellent job. Good!
2006-12-16 19:41:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that certainly isn't a peer reviewed scientific journal. Out of the several hundred, you would think you guys could get something published in a serious way.
PS: They would be fighting over it if you had something good. Everyone wants to publish the Earth shaking stuff.
2006-12-16 19:35:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is a fact. Just as it is a fact that the website you pointed to is full of nonsense.
2006-12-16 19:35:31 · answer #6 · answered by atheist jesus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is a fact, proved by anthropology and science (DNA)
Only nutty and waco religions and ignorants think the contrary.
Get out of that looser´s league.
2006-12-16 19:33:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
just because they don't have all the answers yet doesn't mean its nonsense. Also the fact that there were a couple of hoaxes is bad but it proves nothing, there is plenty of other evidence published weekly. Just read any scientific journal.
2006-12-16 19:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by Om 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hey, you want to purchase some more nonsense? I've got a stack of Bibles I'd like to sell so I don't have to burn 'em.
2006-12-16 19:32:27 · answer #9 · answered by Wrath of Sam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Proof it's nonsense from someone who believes in nonsense. That's rich.
2006-12-16 19:29:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋