not for awhile....due to lack of time...i enjoy it but theres still no evolution..
2006-12-16 05:13:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are there ground squirrels in most Zoos?
Recent scientific and evolutionary discoveries reveal that we mutated from Ground Squirrels not Monkeys or Apes.
Why? The Ground Squirrel is the only mammal that could have survived the Ice Age. (They were nice and cozy underground, and they had an unlimited food supply of old dead roots.)
(Evolution is only a process, any entity that came from outside our Solar System, could have certainly been technologically advanced enough to use and apply evolution in order to inject (mutate) us with abstract reasoning.)
2006-12-16 13:21:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrsOcultyThomas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have taken my children to the zoo many times. But you won't learn about evolution there. Just see cute little animals doing their cute little animal thing, and gain a real appreciation for what a wonderful God we have and what a wonderous creation He made.
2006-12-16 13:17:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think as a believer in evolution that you would want to see your relatives free and would protest a zoo. Just my opinion.
God Bless and Merry Christmas.
2006-12-16 13:19:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I take my nephew since I dont have children myself. Don't know if you know but they dont go into evoution at the zoo, usually just a little info about the animal. So I teach my nephew to enjoy the wonders of God's creations.
2006-12-16 13:12:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by impossble_dream 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Is evolution really scientific?
The “scientific method” is as follows: Observe what happens; based on those observations, form a theory as to what may be true; test the theory by further observations and by experiments; and watch to see if the predictions based on the theory are fulfilled. Is this the method followed by those who believe in and teach evolution?
Astronomer Robert Jastrow says: “To their chagrin [scientists] have no clear-cut answer, because chemists have never succeeded in reproducing nature’s experiments on the creation of life out of nonliving matter. Scientists do not know how that happened.”—The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe (New York, 1981), p. 19.
Evolutionist Loren Eiseley acknowledged: “After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the unenviable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort, could not be proved to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past.”—The Immense Journey (New York, 1957), p. 199.
According to New Scientist: “An increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists . . . argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all. . . . Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.”—June 25, 1981, p. 828.
Physicist H. S. Lipson said: “The only acceptable explanation is creation. I know that this is anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.” (Italics added.)—Physics Bulletin, 1980, Vol. 31, p. 138.
Are those who advocate evolution in agreement? How do these facts make you feel about what they teach?
The introduction to the centennial edition of Darwin’s Origin of Species (London, 1956) says: “As we know, there is a great divergence of opinion among biologists, not only about the causes of evolution but even about the actual process. This divergence exists because the evidence is unsatisfactory and does not permit any certain conclusion. It is therefore right and proper to draw the attention of the non-scientific public to the disagreements about evolution.”—By W. R. Thompson, then director of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ottawa, Canada.
“A century after Darwin’s death, we still have not the slightest demonstrable or even plausible idea of how evolution really took place—and in recent years this has led to an extraordinary series of battles over the whole question. . . . A state of almost open war exists among the evolutionists themselves, with every kind of [evolutionary] sect urging some new modification.”—C. Booker (London Times writer), The Star, (Johannesburg), April 20, 1982, p. 19.
The scientific magazine Discover said: “Evolution . . . is not only under attack by fundamentalist Christians, but is also being questioned by reputable scientists. Among paleontologists, scientists who study the fossil record, there is growing dissent.”—October 1980, p. 88.
What view does the fossil record support?
Darwin acknowledged: “If numerous species . . . have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution.” (The Origin of Species, New York, 1902, Part Two, p. 83) Does the evidence indicate that “numerous species” came into existence at the same time, or does it point to gradual development, as evolution holds?
2006-12-16 13:18:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Livin In Myrtle Beach SC 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
don't forget to add that when one visits to treat the animals with respect. there are many times I've seen children and adults poke sticks, throw stones, etc. at the animals. makes me madder than a wet hen or hornet. how would they like someone to do this to them if they were caged
2006-12-16 13:15:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marvin R 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, religious people; do you suppose we may get to see some of God's creatures in the process of evolving into another species? lol
EDIT:
Dear atheists
Please visit a church and hear about the wondrous salvation of the Lord, Jesus Christ, for the sake of your SOUL!
2006-12-16 13:17:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by lookn2cjc 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Dear Mr. Dumb:
It seems you are earnest about humans remembering their past.
Should I believe that those monkeys in the cage will one day be taking their offspring (uprightly) to a zoo to do what you exhort?
BTW Why do monkeys and apes still exist if they represent the distant past?
Have they eluded the 'natural flow'?
Naughty monkeys!!!
2006-12-16 13:14:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Uncle Thesis 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I love the zoo, don't have any kids, and don't believe in evolution, can I still go?
Also, love the tigers, panda bears, penguins, and the flamingos....
2006-12-16 13:12:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cylon Betty 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What has this got to do with religion? I'm religious and I believe in evolution.
2006-12-16 13:16:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by Heron By The Sea 7
·
0⤊
1⤋