Do you want a Revolutionary War?

Question

I received an email from a "Christian" stating that they are against gay marriage, abortion, etc. (all the things I support as a liberal, pro-choice Atheist). This, I'm used to, as it is the feeling of most Christians I meet.

However, they then proceeded to say the following:

"You and I will never agree on this i see. perhaps the only way this will be setteled is in a Revolutionary war, if that happens, i will of course be ready. "

Is that what people want, or is this some extremist's viewpoint?
Do Christians see the only way they will get people to believe the same as they do is to fight a bloody war that could possibly kill thousands of people, some completely innocent?
Isn't that hypocritical that they are against abortion, but are willing to kill people to make them believe the same way they do?

I know that this is one person's point of view, but I would like others.

Do you feel that in the end, a Revolutionary war is necessary, and would you fight in it?

Definately not judging. That's why I'm asking. Just want other Christians and non-Christian viewpoints on the matter! :)

Answer 1

What is not to understand? They have a monopoly on truth based on a book written long ago by men who thought the world was flat and disease is caused by demons. Not only that, they believe it is a violation of their rights if they are denied the opportunity to use the coercive power of the state to shove their superstitious beliefs down every ones throat. We just have to marginalize them, which may mean an all out war against institutionalized stupidity. What they don't seem to realize is that churches can burn very easily and a little old lady with a book of matches can be a general in the war to restore the Constitution if they are successful in setting up a Theocratic Dictatorship.

Answer 2

I think you're dealing with an extremist. I'm a Christian, and I've never even thought of having another Revolutionary War. No Christian I've ever met has brought up such a possibility. There are better, more sane, ways of dealing with these issues. Our forefathers fought the RW to release the colonies from tyranny, we have other options now, thanks to them. Please do not judge all Christians because of the nuttiness of a few.

Answer 3

I don't know, but that's been the Christian way for 2000 years. Kill everyone that doesn't believe there way. People are so stupid. When the elitists want a population reduction, they don't have to do any thing but convince the people to kill each other. We live in a world full of sheeple.

Answer 4

it relatively is the two a in demand and a Civil conflict. It all started as commonly non violent protests against Gaddafi's regime, yet straight away escalated into violent protests and now armed conflict. the folk want substitute, so in that know it particularly is modern. yet, it has now escalated into open armed conflict between rebels (the in demand ingredient) and government forces and armed civilian (armed forces) supporters of Gaddafi. Libyan civilians vs Libyan civilians and Libyan civilians vs Libyan government forces. it particularly is a Civil conflict o.k., and in the call of political revolution. the only thank you to tell apart the two could be to verify the situation previously conflict starts. to illustrate, Gaddafi has oppressively ruled Libya, in simple terms like Mubarak of Egypt and others in Tunisia, Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. the anybody is now drained and have demanded substitute, a revolution, and in some components, like Libya, this has led to a violent attempt at revolution. by using fact it particularly is Libyans vs Libyans, it is likewise a civil conflict, so it particularly is a in demand civil conflict, a civil conflict to alter issues. Now, a hardship-unfastened occasion of what a undeniable previous civil conflict is may be the events that commonly plagued Africa in the process the top of colonialism. In maximum African international places, the go out of eu colonial powers left a capacity vacuum, wherein no person were groomed or nurtured into government, and the consequence became in simple terms approximately continually a violent civil conflict between multiple communities in the newly autonomous international places attempting to verify their authority. it relatively is in simple terms a civil conflict as no present way of working issues had yet been ordinary, so there is not any revolution, in simple terms a civil conflict for administration.