Does anyone think the uk should adopt an adolf hitler stlye of goverment this would stop any anti-social behaviour terrorists and act as a deterent for any acts of all sorts of crime and terrorism, without death camps and mass extermination of humans because that is wrong. A SS guard instead of the police instead of councillers would be better.
2006-12-16 02:37:35 · 29 answers · asked by G.T 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
yes i do,,,,it would stop anti-social behaviour,,im all for it ,,mate
2006-12-16 03:15:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
To an extent,
i don't believe they should evict every race from the UK but instead just don't allow everyone and anyone in the country.
Margret Thatcher is a good example of low Torrence for immigration which had actually worked.
But it definitely wont stop anti social behaviour or acts of terrorism this will forever be around and it is stupid to think it will stop crimes, because all races are to blame for it!!!
To think that having a one race community will make people live harmoniously with each other is an ignorant way of thinking and wont change anything crime wise within the community, adapting to racial segregation would only encourage racial hatred and I'm sure would only led to bigger problems within the world.
2006-12-17 19:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by Beautiful - 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, one of the things Hitler was good at was uniting the country. Right now, the UK is so completely polarized and divided on every stupid little issue. Moreover, right now, the government is in more fear of the citizens, than the citizens are of the government, thus, leading to the "anti-social" behaviour and terrorist activities. If you leave out the part about killing millions of jews, deathcamps and segregation, Hitler was a genius, but he only used his powers in a bad way.
2006-12-17 07:20:35 · answer #3 · answered by Tulip 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not quite Adolf Hitlers style as he was a nut job, however I think the UK government needs to toughen up on all criminals, the reason most crimes don't worry about committing the crime is because they don't worry about the punishment they r going to receive.
It seems to me that nowadays the criminal gets allot more sympathy than the victim, that really p***** me off, I don't care what sort of child hood these little (f******) darlings have had, it's used as the number 1 excuse to get themselves out of trouble.
I wish they would all be put onto a secluded island somewhere and be left in their own company so that decent society doesn't have to put up with them anymore and for the real sickos like paedophiles give them torture then death. People like that gave up their human rights as soon as they took somebody else's.
2006-12-16 02:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by Sarah M 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
But that is exactly what we have now. Id cards, cameras ever where and immigrants in hidden concentration camps all around the country. We are invading other countries at a good rate and our fuhrer is on TV every night what else do you want?
But credit where credit is due, Adolf would have made the trains run on time, thats for sure.
2006-12-16 10:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not? The UK hasn't been a world colonial power in a long time. I mean, when was the last time they attacked a neighboring country. And why exclude the death camps? A little fascism and ethnic extermination is good for a democracy every now and then.
Freak.
2006-12-16 03:11:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Strangely enough, it is overly Liberal policies that ultimately brings about the very opposite of what they are intended to achieve. That is, an equal reaction in the opposite direction. This happens, because the lefties and the Liberals don't understand human nature. You are right though, people will not put up with this nonsense for much longer.
2006-12-17 09:07:54 · answer #7 · answered by Veritas 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well lets see. NO.
Realistically however lets see if some of that would make sense.
(When I say we I mean the USA and England)
We already have Secret Service and FBI and Royal agents etc... The things they do are pretty intensive if you are considered a bad guy that wont give up terrorist or other info that could lead to an attach on our countries.
Pres. Bush just admitted in part to having such tactics as water challenges that will more scare the HECK out of you rather then actually harm you like a knife to the hand or foot or elsewhere (guys).
This is a fine line sometimes between legal and unlawful acts in the course of protecting a nation.
Most of the ways that we gather intelligence info is secrete. It should be. I bet most of our readers would get sick to their stomach if they saw some of the methods used. However if you search on-line for executions middle east or Muslim war footage. You would see some pretty sick ways they cut off peoples heads while they are tied up and screaming and then choking on their own blood as their head is held up for display like it was nothing more then a slice of toast with sugar and Cinnamon.
Then flash back to the death camps. Pause . . . . . . . . .
It in no way compares to the things I just wrote. If you have read anything about the Nazi experiments and the death of anyone that was not the part of the CHOSEN race, What you normally find is news footage of people marching and falling out on the ground. You may see a pile of dead people in a snow covered ditch.
This may seem harsh but in no way even comes close to the real awful stuff that was done to humans and twins just because it could be done. All in the name of advancing science for the master race.
So even to say, I know you probably meant well, to not include the death camps etc.. I think the ripple effect would be who NOW do you trust? What if your neighbor is pissed at you and turns you in on fake charges? What if it was your mom or dad or brother that the new SS was after?
I think although I can see the merit in your thinking overall it would be more detrimental to society as a hole if we looked at it like the way your suggesting.
I think what your getting at is our society is sick of the bad guys so lets get tough on crime. I AGREE we need to be or even appear to be stronger on deterring crime or terrorism. I think people stay on death row far to long and society pays far to much money to house and feed really awful people.
Again if your loved one is on death row you may think otherwise. But with todays advancements in the forensic sciences I believe with a little tweaking we can solve crimes WITHOUT mistakes and then deal with the criminals in a more expeditious manner. We should show a no nonsense approach to such crimes. (Some we do such as the NO BARGAINING WITH A TERRORIST DEMANDS)
But overall we as a society in general will dictate how we feel and what we will allow to be JUST punishment for crimes. It is a mixture of politics and morality I think.
2006-12-16 03:21:31 · answer #8 · answered by Any Key! Push Me 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't thing any country should adopt Hitler style of government at all. However, I am aware that so many people are trying to have something similar, but trying to chuck out so called 'immigrants'. I think it's totally out of date and so evil, as well as ridiculous. I have never understood why some people have so much trouble to be friends with people who are different.
2006-12-16 08:31:38 · answer #9 · answered by ono 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's pretty dangerous thinking, considering what shape the World is in now! Just look at the US, it is like that administration is "brain dead". Do you really want what you are thinking! It could lead to the destruction of the world or even worse, the annihilation of England and the British Isles.
2006-12-16 02:45:41 · answer #10 · answered by peaches 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
are u insane srry but no adolf hitler was a dictator which is bad if u want millions of ppl to die because of the way they believe then yes maybe u didnt know about hitler being such an awful person
2006-12-16 02:45:43 · answer #11 · answered by donielle 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋