2006-12-15 22:55:25 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
I wouldn't define you - you came up with your own conclusions, and if they don't all fit on one side of some ideological formula, then I applaud you for being sharp and thinking on your own!
There are closed minded, dogmatic people on the left and the right, so it is good when people don't just follow the standard.
2006-12-15 22:59:40 · answer #1 · answered by Doyle Hargraves 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
My gay friends to me I was a creep and a monster for opposing abortion so now I no longer have any gay friends. Even though I was such an avid supporter of gay rights it did not matter to them because I would not cross the line and join them on the abortion issue. I guess homosexuals are not really interested in Democracy, are they.
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice" Rush.
2006-12-18 05:34:36 · answer #2 · answered by Clrinsight 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you do mean? I would define you as a person who is pro gay marriage and pro life. However, this is an interesting opinion you've got, considering that most pro-lifers are also against homosexual unions and/or marriages. But hey, that's statistics, and stats are just numbers, right?
So I guess it would be safe to call you "independent."
2006-12-16 15:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would define you as most people should be defined as an idependant thinker. Anyone that agrees with the entire platform of one of the two parties in a two party system is clearly not thinking for themselves.
I am pro gay marriage, pro choice, and against raising the minimum wage.
2006-12-17 18:05:26 · answer #4 · answered by Jerry 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am against gay marriage and have an open mind on abortion but what concerns me is that members of the gay community keep indoctrinating me and the rest of population including children who have not the slightest idea about what it means to be gay. When a gay person has a relationship with another like minded person it should be conducted behind closed doors as heterosexual couples do. The whole gay issue has become something of a brain washing exercise when the gay agenda becomes so powerful that that it is able to sway those in power to reduce the age of consent from 16 to 14. That my Friend is where the gay issue becomes appalling to heterosexuals of all religious faiths. Allowing gays to have sex in public places and forcing children in kindergarten to be taught what constitutes a homosexual and their practices (as will be the case here in England from April 2007) is to me abhorrent. Do you realize that in England it will be an offense to even quote those verses in the bible condemning homosexuality and will be enforced with a prison sentence to do so. Big brother is sitting on the prime ministers seat in the houses of Parliament so are the communist
I would define you as being anti christian.
2006-12-16 16:39:53 · answer #5 · answered by Redmonk 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That's not enough to define a person you don't know. However you might be interested in:
www.democratsforlife.org
www.soulforce.org
I've found both very interesting.
www.hrc.org is also useful for the gay rights issue.
2006-12-16 07:03:52 · answer #6 · answered by Peace 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Opinionated
2006-12-16 07:44:20 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
America.
2006-12-16 07:58:35 · answer #8 · answered by Some Like 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on if you are using your pro gay to move an agenda forward. If you're just gay, that's it. You have to also look at your other values. If you're pro gay, moving in that agenda, you are antimilitary, protaxes, pro-gov't, etc, you are of the progressive-liberal idealogical base. You have to look at more than two values.
2006-12-16 07:53:31 · answer #9 · answered by spookguy99 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A populist! You move with the times but not really creative in your thought process.
2006-12-16 08:41:04 · answer #10 · answered by Tom Cat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋