English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Doesn't it just mean that they're incompatible and have different needs?My brother broke up with his 20 yr old girlfriend because he couldn't deal with having no sex life.What's so wrong about that?

2006-12-15 18:40:21 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

14 answers

There are a variety of relationships between Men and Women:
1. Serious
2. Casual
3. Sexual (Wham Bang Type)
Incompatibility has nothing to do with it,
What is incompatibility ? Incapable of associating or blending or of being associated or blended because of disharmony, incongruity, or antagonism.

Now if your brother is looking for sex and his G/F disagrees it shows the intention of your brother as conceived by the Girl?

Unless your brother wants to slot himself in the 2nd or 3 rd category and his G/F will and should definitely disagree.

Ask yourself what would you do if a boyfriend of yours insists that if we don't have sex then he will break up.

I would definitely conceive this disrespectful, sex does not come spontaneously it has love, affection, trust and emotions involved.

2006-12-15 19:03:58 · answer #1 · answered by Rahul 6 · 0 0

No! If that became the philosophy then none human beings could ever date by using fact we 'would' get harm! ninety 9.9% of all relationships fail (marriage being the exception), it relatively is the adventure it relatively is significant. there is not any project, and if he likes then you definitely he won't have temptation. He ought to have not any project waiting for intercourse the two. while you're particularly apprehensive in simple terms refer to him, you need to be talking to him approximately your thoughts besides. he will inform you what he needs. There are alluring women everywhere in any respect situations of day, yet he likes you, so why hardship approximately it. I club lots and circulate to a good number of bars with pals and that i've got on no account cheated on a woman chum. Plus, you are able to continually circulate with him in spite of in case you do no longer drink, or in spite of. circulate have relaxing and stay in the present! in simple terms stay trouble-free and communicate.

2016-10-15 01:20:10 · answer #2 · answered by archuletta 4 · 0 0

We don't dump girls who don't want to have sex. Or, rather, that's not quite what we're doing. It's more like, "OK, no problem. Let me know when you're ready." Of course, we can't put our lives on hold while she's making up her mind, now, can we? There's other girls who have decided that they're quite ready now, so we take them in the order in which they become ready. We believe that this is how it is supposed to be.

2006-12-15 18:49:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its just that some guys have needs and its obvious that she wasn't fullfilling his special need. I would rather he break up with her than to be with her and have a sex life with someone else. then she would be getting hurt and he would look like the bad guy. Like they say,"if you dont take care of ur man someone else will,"
My advice to her is to stay single for a while bc many guys at that age are not going to deal with that whole premarital sex situation. or if she could find someone who shares the same premarital sex beliefs.

2006-12-15 18:49:30 · answer #4 · answered by superstar 3 · 0 0

It isn't disrespectful. If he had pressured her into having sex with him, then that would've been disrespectful. It's equally disrespectful of the girl to expect a guy to go along with her beliefs even if he doesn't share them.

2006-12-15 19:16:41 · answer #5 · answered by ginger 6 · 0 0

He dumped her over a choice she made about how to live her life. If he knew up front, then it's harsh. If she just sprung it on him, then it's not and she should have been honest. But, he probably isn't the first and won't be the last to dump her over it.

2006-12-15 18:44:16 · answer #6 · answered by DrkCrwlr 2 · 0 1

I wouldn't call it disrespectful, but it's definitely indicative that they shouldn't be together if he's not willing to wait. There's nothing wrong with wanting to wait, but some people just can't handle not doing it in the meantime.

2006-12-15 18:44:18 · answer #7 · answered by Dumblydore 3 · 0 1

There's nothing wrong with it. Obviously there wasn't enough of a connection for him to stay with no sex life, so I doubt it would have worked out anyway.

2006-12-15 18:49:43 · answer #8 · answered by jonc_52987 2 · 0 1

Nothing if they would stay together he would probably end up cheating on her and then would feel bad, or if not he would pressure her into it eventually and she would end up resenting him for it. It is probably best to split up if you have different beliefs than someone.

2006-12-15 18:45:38 · answer #9 · answered by jdevil_74 2 · 0 0

if they break up because of a little thing like sex the relationship wasn't meant to last.

2006-12-15 18:48:57 · answer #10 · answered by Hephaestus 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers