English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-15 17:59:59 · 6 answers · asked by Rockies VM 6 in Politics & Government Immigration

The Supreme Court explained that while the attractive nuisance doctrine does not ordinarily apply to adults, it may be applied where an adult is injured in an attempt to rescue a child who is imperiled by an artificial condition maintained by the landowner. (US Govt in this case)

The Attractive Nuisance here is the good jobs being made available to "illegal" immigrants, the citizenship offered automatically to all born on US soil, but the extreme riscs and dangers in obtaining those benefits.

This doctine makes the land owner (US Govt) liable for not protecting others from these known risks.

Does this doctrine help or hinder the postion of ICE raids, or, building a fence?

2006-12-15 18:38:38 · update #1

6 answers

For nearly two weeks, Swift & Co. officials fought to block an impending immigration raid they knew was coming. According to newly unsealed federal-court records filed in Amarillo, Texas, on Dec. 4, the company sought an injunction to stop U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from raiding six of its plants across the nation. On Dec. 7, the company's request was denied. And on Tuesday, the raid went forward. While waging the sealed court fight, Swift scrutinized its workers' employment documents. Nearly 400 workers nationally "simply disappeared" because of that review, said Don Wiseman, the company's general counsel. "We never fired... http://test.denverpost.com/extremes/ci_4836252

2006-12-16 16:18:50 · answer #1 · answered by Zoe 4 · 1 0

The only thing wrong with the ICE raids is, to few, we need more, many more, like to start with oh 20 or 30 each day.

2006-12-15 18:04:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

i think of its super yet what might make me even happier could be to ascertain the government. bust the h#ll out of the enterprise!because it incredibly is a month from now Koch ingredients would have replaced the illegals with greater illegals.you would be able to desire to hit those sorry enterprise's of their economic employer debts

2016-10-05 09:19:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They are actually do something while the goverment sits on butt and dosen nothing about the problem.

2006-12-15 22:37:55 · answer #4 · answered by jack 6 · 0 0

I.C.E., FEDS, INS, MINUTEMAN, BORDER PATROL OR FENCE AS HIGH AS THE SKIES WILL NOT STOP ALL OF THOSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS MARCHING NORTH. NOTHING IS GOING TO STOP THESE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO MAKE THIS NATION GREAT AND STRONG.

2006-12-15 18:18:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Help deport them all

2006-12-16 03:18:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers