Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
2006-12-15 17:49:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Susan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/Th3Cv
Funny that all of the liberals, including those that have a liberal bias think that this has something to do with republicans or the TEA Party. Her comments, saying that the TEA party can go to hell was said out of her frustrations of the way that Obama is handling the whole situation. Yes, she is pissed that the conservatives pretty much got their way in regards to the debt limit. This idiot wants to keep borrowing and keep spending and would probably have an orgasm if all of it were spent exclusively on the black population. She is pissed that Obama went to Iowa, Minnesota and and other areas where unemployment rates are in the area of 6% and Obama did not go to Detroit where unemployment among blacks is, arguably 50%. I see the frustrations of the liberals on this forum. They are tired of hearing that Obama is a failure even though they know it for themselves. They can not defend him so all they can do is to use their numerous sock accounts to have questions and answers deleted. The liberals fear that a conservative will take over the White House in 2013. Those fears are well founded. What they should be doing is to start banging on their keyboards sending emails to their democrat electorate and demand that someone in the democrat party oppose Obama in the election. At least they would stand a chance of keeping it. No president has ever won re-election with an unemployment rate higher than 7.2% except for Ronald Reagan. He won because the unemployment rate had been dropping over the the last year of his first term. Unemployment in December of 1983 (1 year before the elections) stood at 10.8% and then it started coming down every month after that. The perception was that things were getting better. What is the perception today? Does anyone think that things are getting better? Reagan did not have to worry about the economy around the world. Obama does not have that luxury. Everywhere you look things are BAD!!! and getting worse. People that voted for Obama are waking up to the fact that Obama's should not have been elected in the first place. Democrats may not feel this way but the fact of the matter is democrats are not the ones that elected Obama, it was the independents and they are all saying "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, well you can't fool me again" I wonder how long it will take some the liberals to get my answer deleted. Before they do let me say that if I pissed them off enough to get my answer deleted you will know that I was absolutely right.
2016-04-01 01:32:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
SOX stands for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the standardized accounting requirements that all publicly owed companies must now go by. Basically this was a law that was passed to protect share holders in a publicly owed company. It was a result of the Enron Collapse.
2006-12-15 17:53:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by j.m.glass 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What Does Sox Stand For
2016-11-11 02:04:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
in the terms of accounting what is stand by ' Sox'?
2015-08-07 15:51:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋