I recently watched a spcial program that came up with that information based a a computer study. the year was off by 6 years and the only very bright star in the heavens at that time was the planet Saturn. Anybody else have anything to add to that statement, it did sound logical the way it was computed.
2006-12-15 16:58:20 · 8 answers · asked by danielditdit 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I believe you are correct because in the bible, I can't remember exactley where but it says in what month Mary concieved and 9 mnths later is April. Jehova witnesses believe this also. I'm not Jehova witness I'm just saying. Nothing against them, their believes may be what we all should be believing.
2006-12-15 20:01:28 · answer #1 · answered by SuperSkinny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I even do not understand at the same time as Jesus replaced into born. yet in my opinion, i imagine Jesus replaced into born sometime in early autumn (September-October) because the Bible says that the shepherds were observing their flocks with the help of evening, which the iciness would were too chilly for. The Bible also says that there replaced into no room for Mary and Joseph interior the motel, which also would make experience seeing that Caesar Augustus ordered a census (said with the help of Luke), and a census would maximum in all probability ensue after the harvest season, round September-October. alongside those similar lines, it also comes right down to this: Do you imagine that the almighty God, the Alpha and the Omega, author of all issues, the single being now uncertain with the help of time or common sense or any of our actual parameters, do you imagine that he would nicely be found out with the help of a computing gadget application, or elementary experience, or logical reasoning? i'm not declaring He won't be able to be understood; i'm basically putting forward that there is alot about Him that we do not/won't be able to understand.
2016-11-30 20:21:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historians and Biblical Scholars place the birth of Christ around 4 B.C. Saturn is a planet not a star. Stars twinkle and planets do not. "Stars" as depicted in the Holy Bible, are mere Angels not suns in outer space. Christ did exist in the human form, as Roman historians of Jesus's time wrote about Him; as well as, Jewish Historians [Josephus]. He was a real being, called Emanuel [God in the flesh dwelling among men] . When people like in this program attribute what they perceive as their little pet project and attach it as fact, to give their views credence cause confusion and doubt. It may of sounded logical but when it is compared to already substantiated facts, it fails the test.
2006-12-15 17:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by guraqt2me 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not religious, so I don't care when Jesus was born. I, however, participate in gift-giving and family holiday reunions. The day assigned to Christmas may or may not be accurate, but the established tradition is here to stay. I see the time and energy spent towards trying to discover the exact date of a probable myth as a total waste. Just "do as the Romans do" and relax. Merry Christmas!
2006-12-15 17:11:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
People are always trying to explain away biblical events. They also say Jesus walked on water when the lake was frozen.
2006-12-15 17:06:18 · answer #5 · answered by The GMC 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one knows exactly when Jesus was born so this is just a load of crap but hey if you buy it I got a bridge for sale real cheap in Arizona.
2006-12-15 17:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by Angelz 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes i do sir, but after reading the answers you allready have, i realize, no one would believe it.
2006-12-15 17:13:06 · answer #7 · answered by ohn D272727 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think jesus is from ur-anus.
2006-12-15 17:02:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋