English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They plan on giving illegals a fast track to citizenship so they will have a wider voter bloc in 2008 to help them get a president in office. The illegals, granted citizenship, will have the Democrats to thank and therefore vote for them. This is the only reason the Democrats want amnesty for the illegals. Why is it so many cannot see this?

2006-12-15 13:46:27 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

23 answers

You are so right Alex. I wish more people could see this.

Illegals need to be shipped home. We don't want them. They are taking jobs, keeping sweatshops in operation, living 23 deep in whatever trailer they can find and collecting our tax money for assisstance as well as driving up our medical costs for their "FREE" medical.

Before someone is allowed to become a citizen, they should prove that they are worthy. What are they doing here if they hate AMERICA. If you hate America, move to France and work at Target. You will fit right in. If you are a flag burner and can't stand everything that America stands for, you absolutely should not be here.

The Democrats are always trying to pad their voting base. This is why they claim to cater to minorities, when actually, it is the republicans who defend everything the minorities stand for (okay, except crime). It was the Republicans who abolished slavery. It is the Republicans who are color blind.

Get rid of the illegals and get rid of the drugs and America will be a better place. People applying for citizenship should not be allowed to bash our government. Non Citizens should not be able to vote for our laws or our leadership.

2006-12-16 02:12:02 · answer #1 · answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4 · 2 2

I am a little confounded by this because it was a Republican Congress and President that was in favor of this. It helps only the Democratic party.
I am not for this, at all, but I don't have a better answer except to send them back and that might be what should be done.

You didn't ask, but I will tell it anyway.
Over the past several years since hurricane Ivan hit Gulf Shores AL, we have noticed that the reconstruction is dominated by Mexican workers. These are not minimum wage jobs and should have been highly attractive to college students or anyone who lost their job because of Ivan - and there were a lot of people out of work. I didn't understand why there were not a majority of Americans building these condos. Have we become such wimps or too good for manual labor?
Perhaps someone, out there, can shed some light on this

2006-12-15 14:04:52 · answer #2 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 3 0

Yeah, and putting up a big wall will help....

How about we just solve the problem instead of complain about it.

Immigrants come here, especially from Mexico, in hopes to find work. And they do. They are paid illegally. They are paid crap wages under the table, or even minimum wage under the table. And they take it, because even that is way better than what they make in Mexico. They are not STEALING jobs from Americans. National minimum wage is $5.15 and hour. US citizens don't work these jobs, because even if you were single with no family to raise, $5.15 an hour won't even pay the gas you need to get to and from work. It's a disgrace. So it's easy to get immigrants with nothing to do these jobs that are too cheap for anyone here to work for.

Quick way to slow down illegal immigration? Put some hefty fines in place for companies that hire illegal immigrants. Once immigrants realize they can't work here without a green card, then it'll slow way down. Oh, but wait a minute.. Lobbyists want the cheap labor for industry and are willing to line the RNC pockets with campaign contributions to get it. And Bush isn't going to impose fines on companies that support him. So, umm, wait, that means Bush is responsible.

2006-12-16 11:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by AnswerMom 4 · 0 1

i advise that the properly cut back for contributions be finished away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement although stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social chance-loose practices isn't a "grant away" application yet one which one and all persons contribute to love a mark downs plan, and must be chance-loose hostile to diverse makes use of with techniques from using the authorities. Do you compromise or disagree and why? when you're so stressful about it then why do not you; first placed it lower back into the interior optimum sector and make to were no can take out money from it for his or her personal pastime, second pay lower back each and every penny you've borrowed from both Social chance-loose practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and those who come over right here yet with techniques from no potential paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it the similar for each guy or female; in diverse words authorities officials are to participate in it and in the journey that they bypass with some element more advantageous they do it on their personal with out the tax payers funding it?yet, the business stytem feeding the imbalances had with techniques from no potential been rather replaced. They, a crew of scholars, reported that each and each and every human being expenditures of pastime must be 3% or a lot less for each guy or female to regulate into wealthy if needed (that ought to favor to be genuine also to taces). the severe economic difficulty must be, they reported, even as there have been no expenditures of pastime. Why not attempt this answer? the wealthy ought to although be wealthy. My question is: even as soial chance-loose practices will become a project correct to federal costs, why not artwork with a balanced or income funds and spend no more advantageous suited than is equipped in, as any kinfolk individuals has to attempt for? Why not ban all loobying elements with the purpose to get guidelines that serve the country? God bless united statesa..

2016-11-30 20:13:24 · answer #4 · answered by laranjeira 4 · 0 0

Democrats are ruining this country and have been since the 1700s. What's bad about this is they usually get their way. I believe we can thank the Democrats for making up global warming, encouraging vegetarianism, and starting the "save the enviroment/whales foundation". Now, they want amnesty, and will probably brainwash a bunch of people into that. Canada, here I come!

2006-12-15 16:30:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The same reason why people cannot see that 40% of hispanics are underage for voting. And why, in spite of threats this year from the illegal supporter community, voter turnout in particularly the hispanic voting block stayed the same- in other words-low. Also, that different nationalitites of hispanics vote different issues. Primary concern among those of Mexican descent is immigration, but those from Colombia or Cuba for example are very conservative people, and vote on social issues. And they are often Republican. And if immigration is no longer a concern, who says the hispanic vote would stay with the Democrats. A large number of hispanics who voted in presidential elections voted for G.W. Why? Because Mexican-Americans also tend to be conservative on social issues too. You don't see to many pro-choice Mexican immigrants, do you?

2006-12-15 14:06:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Very good point. Did you know that the Dem's have already put forth a bill that would prohibit local law enforcement from detaining an illegal alien, and putting restrictions on the border patrol making it more difficult for them to stop, detain and deport an illegal.
A large number of people vote democrat for what the Dem's give them from the treasury. I can't think of any major legislation that a Dem has put forth that of a true benefit to the country as a whole.

2006-12-15 16:32:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Hey Alex...

We have something that you will appreciate... unrelated to the question... figured you'd appreciate it's accuracy.

Agenda for the Democratic National Convention for 2008:

7:00 P.M. Opening flag burning ceremony
7:05 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
7:15 P.M. Pledge of allegiance to U.N. skipping the words, “Under God”.
7:20 P.M. Opening speech. “How G. Bush pulled off making Katrina look like a Hurricane.”-- Ray “Schoolbus” Nagan.
7:25 P.M. “Real Estate” – “Dingy” Harry Reed & Hillary Clinton
7:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
7:30 till 8:00 P.M. Nonreligious prayer, worship and meditation. Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton.
8:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
8:05 P.M. Ceremonial tree hugging
8:10 P.M. Tribute to ACLU. How to fit more immigrants in the boats-PHD-piled high and deep.
8:15- 8:30 P.M. Gay Wedding -- Barney Frank Presiding.
8:30 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:35 P.M. “Free Saddam Rally”. Cindy Sheehan-- Susan Sarandon.
8:40 P.M. “Destroying the OZONE – the Conservative Agenda” – Al Gore
8:45 P.M. “How to turn young minds into Liberal Lemmings”. -- University of Massachusetts
8:50 P.M. “Amnesty for Illegals – our swing vote” – Al Sharpton
8:55 P.M. “Buying the Media” – Peter Jennings
9:00 P.M. Keynote speech -“The proper etiquette for surrender” -- French President Jacques Chirac
9:05 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
9:10 P.M. “Defensive Driving” – Ted Kennedy
9:15 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
9:20 P.M. Collection to benefit Osama Bin Laden kidney transplant fund
9:25 P.M. “Christian Evil Doers” -- Rosie O’Donnell
9:30 P.M. Unveiling of plan to free freedom fighters from Guantanamo Bay -- Sean Penn
9:35 P.M. “Marijuana – How to not inhale” – Slick Willy
9:40 P.M. “Why I hate the Military”… a short talk by William Jefferson Clinton
9:45 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
9:50 P.M. Dan Rather presented “Truth in Broadcasting award” -- Michael Moore
9:55 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
10:00 P.M. How G. Bush and D. Rumsfeld brought down the World Trade Center Towers -- Howard Dean
10:20 P.M. “The 9-1-1 Conspiracy” – The Baghdad Broads & the Jersey Girls.
10:30 P.M. Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Mahmud Ahnadinejad
10:35 P.M. “How to have riots at the Gas Station.” – Jimmy Carter
10:40 P.M. “Hostage Negotiation 101” – Jimmy Carter
10:45 P.M. “Why Guns are Evil” – Femi-Nazi Feinstein
11:00 P.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
11:05 P.M. Al Gore reinvents Internet
11:10 P.M. “Draft Dodging” -- Slick Willy
11:15 P.M. “Our Troops are War criminals” -- John Kerry the War Hero
11:20 P.M. “What happens when you don’t pay attention and do well in school” – John Kerry
11:25 P.M. “Cold Cash” - William Jefferson (D) Louisiana
11:30 P.M. Coronation of Mrs. Rodham Clinton
11:40 P.M. “A Long Walk in the Woods with Foster” – Hillary Clinton
11:45 P.M. Silent Auction Fundraiser to wipe out NRA – Michael Dukakis
11:50 P.M. “How to indict a Soldier” -- Jack Murtha
11:55 P.M. “Treatment of Hostages” – Jane Fonda
12:00 A.M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
12:05 A.M. Bill asks Ted to drive Hillary home
12:10 A.M. Bill Clinton passes out Ceremonial Cigars & Lights up. T. Kennedy proposes toast.
12:15 A.M. Riot and burning the building down because of smoking inside to promote Freedom of Speech

2006-12-16 17:16:49 · answer #8 · answered by Jade 5 · 3 1

Then is Bush a Democrat?

He backs amnesty. He does it because fat-cat lobbyists want the cheap labor for industry and are willing to line the RNC pockets with campaign contributions to get it.

All just politics I suppose. But of course, when Democrats do it, it's horrible.

2006-12-16 02:48:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I think I answered one of your questions before with the same info I am about to give you.
http://www.spp.gov/
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
This was done by your president without the consent of the people or congress. He doesn't care about immigration.

2006-12-15 15:15:20 · answer #10 · answered by . 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers