Do poor countries really need military forces?

Question

Ok... I come from a country without milice since 1948 and is in the middle of Central America (yep... went through the 80´s without any armed forces... guess what country that is!). So a country has done it... has proved it is possible, and that military forces may be, useless... especially for poor countries which should be investing in education, health systems, etc., instead of weapons (which MIGHT be used in the EVENTUALITY of an invasion).
In fact, most military forces in poor countries had been used against their own people than to fight others... SO, why do not poor countries get rid of their military forces? Don´t tell it is impossible... Panamá, Costa Rica and even Haiti have done it.

O... btw... the central american conflict was solved through pacific means against reagans will...

Answer 1

In a nutshell, a military is the best deterrent to those wishing to do a country harm, both externally and internally. The civilian population and their way of life collectively deserve to be protected so that it may perpetuate itself. Countries with weak militaries are prime targets for insurgencies, hostilities, civil unrest, political disolution, and other illegal actions.

Answer 2

It would have to be many countries signing treaties and doing it together. Many of the poorer countries base their entire governments off the power of the military, Throughout the 1950's we all saw what the Banana republics did with them. Corruption i guess would be the biggest oponent of a stand down in military force.

Answer 3

variety of a moronic query. If nations with risky goverenments get their arms on a nukes, like N. Korea, like Iran, this can be a well possiblity that terrorists firms will uncover a approach to get them. Where they may be able to and can be utilized in any side of the sector. The U.S. used the A-bomb to defeat a nation who, together with the Nazi's, used to be making an attempt to take over the sector. Yea, it stored American lives, as good as thousands of alternative lives. I'm now not certain wherein you're from, however use your head, and ask your self wherein this international might be with out the US. The numerous American carrier contributors who've misplaced their lives combating for foriegn persons is amazing. It sounds to me like you will have fed into the propaganda. Im now not certain what or wherein you return from, however get your possess critiques, your possess ideals, and check out to make use of a few objectivity.

Answer 4

I don't disagree with you. However, look what is going on throughout Africa. It's a freakin mess and would be much more unstable without organized militaries. Count yourself lucky if you feel that way, but what works for you will not work for all.

Answer 5

Many leaders of poor countries need militaries to keep them in power. And leaders' number 1 priority is themselves.

Answer 6

Only reason your country could get away without having a military is because the US exists. Try and deny it and I will invade your country.

Answer 7

ya, i think they do because they need someone to look after the civilians. lets just say that if somebody robbed a bank than the police and military force can handle it, and if their are crimes they need military.

Answer 8

yes every country poor or not has the right to protect themselves and their people the best way they can

Answer 9

Yes they do.
m

Answer 10

The US saved your as*. so that you didn't have to.