A recent study showed that 2% of the british population now live in australia, i plan on being on of them :D
2006-12-17 00:05:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by katze 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read something on these lines very recently, it was on a daily basis... and though I can't remember the exact number, it's very high... and is, exactly half as many, as those migrating here, and that's HIGH! I was stunned to be quite honest, when I read it. If I find the site again.
Addendum: Not the site I read before, but it carries similar statistics, the link for further reading is below it.
THE FACTS ON IMMIGRATION
FACT: Britain has a net migration gain of 500 a day: 1,500 foreigners arrive to work for at least a year, while 1,000 people leave daily. The net immigration total was 185,000 in 2005.
source: http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1626382006&bad=144108
pasted info from another news site dated 25 August 2006:
POPULATION HITS 60M
THE UK's population has passed 60million for the first time.
A rise of 375,000 (0.6 per cent) took the figure to 60.2million last June, the Office for National Statistics said yesterday.
The rise, fuelled by migration, is the biggest since 1962.
At 0.8 per cent, Northern Ireland had the fastest population growth. England's grew by 0.7 per cent, Scotland's by 0.3 per cent and Wales by 0.2 per cent. Scotland's population is 5.1million, England 50.4million, Wales three million and Northern Ireland 1.7million.
The migration of citizens from nations which joined the EU in May 2004 has been the driving force behind the increase.
Natural change, the difference between births and deaths, increased from 104,000 in 2003-4 to 127,000 in 2004-5.
Pasted news on immigration and emigration:
2006-12-15 10:37:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have had the same experience as " Throwmelonsatbuttercup" I lived in oz for 14 years and am back here now because of family and I absolutely hate it here now, not because of the different cultures but because it is too crowded and very hard to make a decent living. The air is not fresh, you just can't smell that fresh morning dew anymore. I will go back one day.....
2006-12-16 08:27:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anne A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
britain of old and custom does no longer be able to stay alongside of cutting-part economies. its artwork stress does no longer be intense adequate to keep up a effectual monetary gadget till each and every indigenous English relations replaced into having 10+ toddlers and that has its own complications. from an monetary standpoint, it truly is inevitable to allow immigrants and bolster up our artwork stress. the u . s . is an excellent get at the same time of mass immigration, and the prosperity which will nicely be received from it. at one aspect its monetary gadget replaced into 4 circumstances more effective than the 2d maximum monetary gadget... it will be effective to be certain britain rule because the premier u . s . once lower back.
2016-11-26 21:43:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by kulpa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm this is an interesting question - I often think about doing it but know I would miss Scotland way too much (yes I may be mad but a true patriot)
I also wonder if it matches the immigration rates (like birth and death rates - ok if the equal)
2006-12-15 10:26:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by mandg 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The total number was on the BBC website yesterday. I am one of them that leave the country to live elsewhere and I am so pleased that I do as the uk has jsut got worse and worse
2006-12-15 10:50:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by gaulde 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Britain's population was 50 million in 1950, and has taken 56 years to grow by one sixth.
Australia's population was 7.7 million in 1950, and in that same time has more than doubled.
2006-12-15 12:15:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mardy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont know how many - a lot go - but a lot come back..very quickly. Grass is not alway greener on the other side
2006-12-15 11:23:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
one in ten methinks.?
2006-12-16 05:35:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by heavysoul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋