the manger is to show his humble nature. the lamb etc.....your other points prelude to the importance and biblical basis for the eucharist within the catholic church. his birth also fulfilled the words of the prophets from the old testament.
2006-12-15 09:15:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by fenian1916 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The manger was a sign of humbleness, Our GOD and KING born in a stable in a manger?? This is the key to becoming a Christian: humility to accept that everything comes from GOD.
Jesus is the truth, the way and the life!
"Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One"
(Shema Yisrael Adonai eloheinu Adonai ehad)
2006-12-15 09:10:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by St. Mike 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Christmas timber are from Northern eu pagan traditions. In mid-iciness, the solar is round for a couple of minutes on a daily basis. lighting fixtures a candle to inspire him (intentional) to go back lower back in all his glory and putting it on a tree looked as if it would artwork and the days were given longer So by the years human beings positioned extra candles on timber purely to make it even extra in all possibility to artwork. at the same time as Christianity replaced into enforced by Rome after Emperor Constantine, the interior of sight pagan customs weren't abolished. the excuses for them were replaced; so we now associate Christmas with the beginning of Christ. yet another one is Easter. This replaced into initially a fertility banquet in honour of the fertility goddess Eostre. at the same time as Christianity replaced into enforced, the reason of get at the same time replaced into replaced from the resurrection of the plants to the resurrection of Christ. yet we nevertheless carry on to fertility symbols, like Easter Eggs and easter Bunnies. The beginning of Jesus isn't in each and each and every of the gospels, and neither are the shepherds and magi. even with the undeniable fact that the tale is that he replaced into born in a manger in a reliable in Bethlehem. A reliable ought to have noted a crumple which beasts were kept. the tale has a kind of fairytale high quality about it, and that i believe that that's what it replaced into.
2016-11-26 21:36:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can see the commonalities in the passages. But I think you are taking it too literally.
I agree with the answer that it fulfills the prophecies found in Psalm and Isiah, and the minor prophets. I also agree it shows the humility in Christ. He was the Son of God but God decided that entrance. It teaches me not to get consumed with what man builds and sees as significant.
2006-12-15 09:21:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by P&B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cool! I'd never considered the manger before. And Bethlehem, is the city of David, through whom the Christ would come. The O.T. specificaly predicts Bethlehem as Christ's place of birth. God is awesome!!
2006-12-15 09:15:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by edward_lmb 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
To fulfill Bible Prophecy.
2006-12-15 09:11:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The King of Kings chose poverty over riches and and as you have pointed out He is the Bread come down from Heaven.
2006-12-15 09:09:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I believe that God uses symbolism to say, "Hey you! Pay attention! This is important!" The bread references are not lost on God. He's quite clever when it comes to symbolism.
2006-12-15 09:13:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by philyra2 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
definetly! There's so many 'types'* in the Bible, and I'm always curious to hear more.
*A 'type' is a foreshadowing of another event, Noah and the Ark is a 'type' of baptism.
2006-12-15 11:37:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by musicgirl31♫ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sure there is. I don't think that man can anser that question though. There is a porpose for everything God does.
2006-12-15 09:09:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by sittinncat 1
·
2⤊
0⤋