who cares about the biblical nonsense. It has nothing to do with what Jesus taught.
It is simple Jewish nonsense, rewritten in the 4th century to subvert the true teachings of Jesus.
Love and blessings Don
2006-12-15 07:44:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The very reason Catholics have priests instead of ministers, is so the priest can "stand-in" for Jesus, until Christ becomes truly present on the altar for us, at every Mass.
When the priest recites the words of consecration, and the Holy Spirit transforms the bread and wine into the real and substantial body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ, the entire Catholic faith community receives the ultimate form of divine sustenance and provision from God, our heavenly father.
It's only fitting then, for this and many other good reasons, that the priest who dedicates his life to help make this necessary provision possible for us should share, at least in an honorary manner, the title of "father".
As for your very strict, obviously biased, and totally incorrect interpretation of scripture, there are numerous other passages where Jesus himself refers to persons other than God, as "father" and where the apostles apply the term to both themselves, and others.
Look it up in your Bible.
2006-12-15 08:26:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
So, according to this, you can't call your Dad Father? I mean, sometimes I call him Father & other times Dad & sometimes I call him Daddy. I never knew I was committing a sin.
2006-12-15 07:43:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jaysangl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
another question....why do they call the pope Holy father? they obviously dont read the scriptures......why do they repeat prayers?
2006-12-15 08:02:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Emma 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think because most catholic priests are probably perverts "deep dow n inside"
2006-12-15 07:44:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by amecake83 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Catholics are just following the example that the Apostles had shown the early Christians.
The New Testament is filled with examples of and references to spiritual father-son and father-child relationships. Many people are not aware just how common these are, so it is worth quoting some of them here.
Paul regularly referred to Timothy as his child: "Therefore I sent to you Timothy, my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, to remind you of my ways in Christ" (1 Cor. 4:17); "To Timothy, my true child in the faith: grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord" (1 Tim. 1:2); "To Timothy, my beloved child: Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord" (2 Tim. 1:2).
He also referred to Timothy as his son: "This charge I commit to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophetic utterances which pointed to you, that inspired by them you may wage the good warfare" (1 Tim 1:18); "You then, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 2:1); "But Timothy’s worth you know, how as a son with a father he has served with me in the gospel" (Phil. 2:22).
Paul also referred to other of his converts in this way: "To Titus, my true child in a common faith: grace and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Savior" (Titus 1:4); "I appeal to you for my child, Onesimus, whose father I have become in my imprisonment" (Philem. 10). None of these men were Paul’s literal, biological sons. Rather, Paul is emphasizing his spiritual fatherhood with them.
Perhaps the most pointed New Testament reference to the theology of the spiritual fatherhood of priests is Paul’s statement, "I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel" (1 Cor. 4:14–15).
Peter followed the same custom, referring to Mark as his son: "She who is at Babylon, who is likewise chosen, sends you greetings; and so does my son Mark" (1 Pet. 5:13). The apostles sometimes referred to entire churches under their care as their children. Paul writes, "Here for the third time I am ready to come to you. And I will not be a burden, for I seek not what is yours but you; for children ought not to lay up for their parents, but parents for their children" (2 Cor. 12:14); and, "My little children, with whom I am again in travail until Christ be formed in you!" (Gal. 4:19).
John said, "My little children, I am writing this to you so that you may not sin; but if any one does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous" (1 John 2:1); "No greater joy can I have than this, to hear that my children follow the truth" (3 John 4). In fact, John also addresses men in his congregations as "fathers" (1 John 2:13–14).
By referring to these people as their spiritual sons and spiritual children, Peter, Paul, and John imply their own roles as spiritual fathers. Since the Bible frequently speaks of this spiritual fatherhood, we Catholics acknowledge it and follow the custom of the apostles by calling priests "father." Failure to acknowledge this is a failure to recognize and honor a great gift God has bestowed on the Church: the spiritual fatherhood of the priesthood.
Catholics know that as members of a parish, they have been committed to a priest’s spiritual care, thus they have great filial affection for priests and call them "father." Priests, in turn, follow the apostles’ biblical example by referring to members of their flock as "my son" or "my child" (cf. Gal. 4:19; 1 Tim. 1:18; 2 Tim. 2:1; Philem. 10; 1 Pet. 5:13; 1 John 2:1; 3 John 4).
2006-12-15 07:56:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋