Would he be labled a fruitcake and none would believe him? The bible is made up of chapters written thousands of years ago by men. Supposedly it's God's word. So what happens when a man claims God spoke his word and wanted this guy to add it to the Bible...would you religious freaks believe him? How can you say God didn't speak to this guy?
2006-12-15 07:11:16 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Reality Check:
If someone today says God spoke to them we all know THEY ARE CRAZY!
If someone claimed God spoke to them and it's in the bible well now there God actually did talk to them. Get real those people were just as crazy as people today who claim to talk to pink monkeys!
There is NO GOD to speak to anyone!
There are only crazy people that think invisible beings tell them crazy crap!
2006-12-15 08:13:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Would that be called a little book? Ya - I'm writing one too, only, I started immediatly after Sept. 11th 2001. That was when I saw something like a great mountain, on fire, mixed with blood, fall into the sea. I sent the first part of my book to, Pope John Paul 11, Vatican City, World Counsil of Churches, Geneva, Switzerland, and 3 places in the United States. Mailed out - Feb. 16th 2004. But they were weakly worded, but I thought "christians would get it, but apparently not.
I am going to be composing a letter to the new Pope pretty soon though, but this time I will have spell check.
2006-12-15 07:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They'd label him as a fruitcake. People know--albeit, unconsciously--that there is a large possibility that this irrational stuff is probably just stories made up by ancient man. A person who doesn't think this at all would be more likely to believe the fruitcake; the fruitcake has as much proof of hearing god's word as those authors.
Were you planning to start a cult or something? I bet you'd find followers if you wrote a New New Testament. Their irrational methods of thinking make them more susceptible.
2006-12-15 07:16:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The final verses in the Bible tell us that nothing more is to be added to the Bible so it would not be accepted. Same as people who go arond saying "The Lord told me...." God does not speak to individuals like that anymore, Divine revelation has ended.
Revelation 22:18 "...words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book."
2006-12-15 07:15:35 · answer #4 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dude, the Bible is likewise a historic previous e book. this is only reporting what befell. this is not any longer continuously endorsing what befell. Lot's incest became incorrect...even though it befell and it had to be stated because ti became the end results of having inebriated! keep in innovations Noah? - he were given inebriated too. Please fairly imagine about your arguments before you repeat someone elses. Muhammad married a Catholic Nun. the entire faith became created by using the Catholic church to rid aspects of Europe and Africa of the type of Christianity that the Catholic Church did not accept as true with (Spain, Italy, Northern Africa). i do not worship a God it is blood thirsty nor one which desires to dominate this international - Jesus stated that his Kingdom isn't of this international - all you Islamists communicate about is international domination - you may have this international - it really is going to be destroyed very quickly. I is only no longer right here. you assert that Jesus became only a reliable guy! LOL He stated that he became the Son of God. That makes him both a liar ...or... the Son of God. you could't have it both innovations.
2016-10-18 08:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would God be asking a man to write new chapters of a book that has been so miss-used and manipulated by translators for so many hundreds of years now?
2006-12-15 07:18:40 · answer #6 · answered by Feather 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uhh...us "religious" freaks got high orders form God about this:
at the end of the last chapter of the last book in the Bible:)(Revelation):
"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. "
Peace
2006-12-15 07:24:01 · answer #7 · answered by Bazsa 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Revealation says there are no longer revealation to Man after the completion of the New Testament. Therefore no words can be added to the Bible.
2006-12-15 07:15:11 · answer #8 · answered by snowynight 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Bible was compiled by the Church corporately. If this guy writes a book that is universally accepted into the Christian liturgy across denominational lines, then sure - it could end up in the Bible.
2006-12-15 07:14:09 · answer #9 · answered by NONAME 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's actually a quite logical thing, when you think about it. God called prophets in ancient times to teach the people. God never changes. Why then, wouldn't He call prophets to teach people today?
In fact, there is a prophet today who has been called by God to teach the whole world. His name is Gordon B. Hinckley. As with all prophets, some people choose to believe him and follow his teachings and some people don't. But I'd encourage people to follow his teachings; he's a true witness of Jesus Christ.
Here's a link to one of the most recent talks given by Gordon B. Hinckley for the worldwide audience:
http://lds.org/conference/talk/display/0,5232,23-1-646-30,00.html
And to find out more, see this site: www.mormon.org.
2006-12-15 07:19:00 · answer #10 · answered by drshorty 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋