Evolutionists, check this out...?

Question

Lets ask the clever people what they think:

Mathematician M. P. Schutzenberger stated in 1967, "…We believe that there is a considerable gap in the Neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, and we believe this gap to be of such nature that it cannot be bridged within the conception of Biology

Sir Cecil Wakeley, KBE, CB, LLD, MCD, Doctor of Science, FRCS and past president of the Royal College of Surgeons of Great Britain, admitted: "There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution

Evolutionist Dr. Paul Lemoine stated in an article, "Evolution is a sort of dogma in which the priests no longer believe, but they maintain for their people

A recent poll suggests that 65 percent of adults think there is insufficient evidence to support evolution

Do you need more quotes before realising what you believe in is just a big lie?

...or will you just ignore these fact???

Answer 1

you're an idiot - fast forward to the 21st Century. moron.

Answer 2

you don't no the Darwin's threoy. theEvolution by natural selection, the central concept of the life's work of Charles Darwin, is a theory. It's a theory about the origin of adaptation, complexity, and diversity among Earth's living creatures. If you are skeptical by nature, unfamiliar with the terminology of science, and unaware of the overwhelming evidence, you might even be tempted to say that it's "just" a theory. In the same sense, relativity as described by Albert Einstein is "just" a theory. The notion that Earth orbits around the sun rather than vice versa, offered by Copernicus in 1543, is a theory. Continental drift is a theory. The existence, structure, and dynamics of atoms? Atomic theory. Even electricity is a theoretical construct, involving electrons, which are tiny units of charged mass that no one has ever seen. Each of these theories is an explanation that has been confirmed to such a degree, by observation and experiment, that knowledgeable experts accept it as fact. That's what scientists mean when they talk about a theory: not a dreamy and unreliable speculation, but an explanatory statement that fits the evidence. They embrace such an explanation confidently but provisionally—taking it as their best available view of reality, at least until some severely conflicting data or some better explanation might come along. .cEvolutionary theory, though, is a bit different. It's such a dangerously wonderful and far-reaching view of life that some people find it unacceptable, despite the vast body of supporting evidence. As applied to our own species, Homo sapiens, it can seem more threatening still. Many fundamentalist Christians and ultra-orthodox Jews take alarm at the thought that human descent from earlier primates contradicts a strict reading of the Book of Genesis. Their discomfort is paralleled by Islamic creationists such as Harun Yahya, author of a recent volume titled The Evolution Deceit, who points to the six-day creation story in the Koran as literal truth and calls the theory of evolution "nothing but a deception imposed on us by the dominators of the world system." The late Srila Prabhupada, of the Hare Krishna movement, explained that God created "the 8,400,000 species of life from the very beginning," in order to establish multiple tiers of reincarnation for rising souls. Although souls ascend, the species themselves don't change, he insisted, dismissing "Darwin's nonsensical theory." heck this web page out also :

Answer 3

It is right that it is hard to prove a theory beyond
doubt. This is particularly true in science because scientists can be very skeptical. The approach many scientists take is to try to disprove a theory.
That way they know it is false. Evolution is a theory that has not yet been disproved. It is always best to define one's terms before explaining. It also cannot be proven conversely or with biological evidence.
It will never be proven true because we can not know for sure. But by using the scientific method, we can make a good guess, based on careful observations of the earth as it exists today, not as some scientists have described as "probably".
Some may understand, most won't or care to.
Random DNA mutation cannot occur sporadically but if evolution did happen as some say then there would have had to been a "program".
Hence Intelligent Design.

Answer 4

Any quotes from 1967 are extremely dated. The "quote" from Dr. Paul Lemoine is taken out of context. Sir Cecil Wakeley a surgeon? And exactly why would he be qualified to offer a sound opinion on the current state of knowledge and what it indicates? (Oh, by the way, he died over 20 years ago).

So what we have is quotes taken out of context and from 20 plus years ago, not the solid basis for a successful arguement.

Answer 5

Natural selection theory may be flawed, yet how else do you explain the genetic variation in the human species? In fact, taking the human case aside, the behavior of viruses is nearly fully explained by Darwinian mutation and adaption. Theories are not facts; theories are working models that we use to explain our environment until some genius develops a more suitable one. Unless you have a replacement for evolution theory, you lack a leg to stand on. And please don't reply that christian creation science is a suitable alternative--you can't get the level of genetic variation present in humans in the timeframe the bible purports the first humans originated.

Answer 6

Did you notice that about 65% of the world isn't Christian, so 65% of the world believes there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that Jesus of Nazareth was the promised Messiah.

Belief doesn't make right, buddy.

Answer 7

Evidently you only bothered to research the comments and quotations that support what you already believe yourself. But the real question is, why are you trying so hard? In my whole life, I never ran into one "evolutionist" who cared a rap about trying to "convert" a creationist. They may intelligently, and energetically defend their personal way of thinking, if challenged, but generally don't go about gratuitously trumpeting it, and denouncing everybody who doesn't agree.
Every human on the planet has the inalienable right to be the owner of his own mind, and the master of his own thinking and believing. You do not have to agree with those who see things differently from the way you do. It is enough to simply respect their right to think as they do, just as you yourself would want your own rights respected.

Answer 8

Alright, you posted three questions so far on evolutionists. Quotes meaning nothing this argument and most adults, as well as people, don't care enough to see the evidence.

And how many facts will you ignore while you keep believing in a book of quotes?

Answer 9

I see you get the same results as I do when you use scientific reasoning with the God haters. They don't want to hear it, they have made up their minds no evidence in all the scientific world will get through to them I have used my evidence on the beginnings of life, the chirality of both proteins and DNA and what responses to I get when I use HARD scientific evidence, Silence. Jim

Answer 10

Hmmm... I wonder what people should believe instead? That some etherial, ephemeral all-knowing being created all of this in a week? You can present all of the data you like to refute evolution - that's part of science. You test things. You have control groups. You question. That's fine. Where, exactly, are you going with this?

Answer 11

What up smokey, 420 here. Excellent. However, look at your thumbs down :-( lol. Evolutionists will not accept anything less than being begat by a rock and a monkey.