Restaurant wedding reception in small private room with less than 100 people. No alcohol served and no dacing afterwords. Wedding cake is served at the wedding. It's a small but elegent wedding. Wedding cermony is at church.
2006-12-15 04:29:43 · 12 answers · asked by Lucy L 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Weddings
Wendy's or McDonalds.
Sounds awfully expensive if anywhere else, for 100 people.
2006-12-15 04:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
not at all tacky. people do it all the time. that's why restaurants have banquet rooms. there is nothing wrong with that sort of wedding reception. if that is what you want then do it. as for walking into the restaurant in full wedding garb, everyone loves weddings and you just may find that the other restaurant guests will give you a hand clap or at the very least some nodds and smiles.
2016-05-24 21:00:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that's what your tastes are for, than I see no problem with it. You can decorate the private room to your tastes so it's not plain and boring. If you're not going to have wedding cake at the reception, than you may want to have a nice, sweet, decadent dessert to end the meal off with
2006-12-16 15:06:30 · answer #3 · answered by Patricia D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds fine! But at least have some background music playing even if there is no dancing it's nice ot have music during dinner.
And of course, the reception hosts should pay for entire dinner reception which they have planned for, coat check fees for all the guests, all gratuities, and everyone's parking. Guests should not have to pay for any of these items-- that is all the responsbiility of the host.
2006-12-15 08:26:55 · answer #4 · answered by Etiquette Gal 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have been to many wedding receptions at restaurants, they were great, no alcohol made the night very pleasant and everything went smoothly. Congratulations and have a Wonderful wedding.
2006-12-15 05:24:24 · answer #5 · answered by Gabriele 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We did that for our wedding. We went to an Itailan place and did not serve alcholol. It was about $850 for 25 people and we were both really happy about how it turned out.
2006-12-15 04:53:32 · answer #6 · answered by beddybeddy83 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
oh my that sound ugly you are taking away the dancing people want to really celebrate with the newly weds but hey its all about the two of you never heard of it or seen it dont sound sweet gives a bitter taste to my mouth if its a financial reason you can have your reception in a backyard with a dj
2006-12-15 04:52:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sounds great and intimate...except for the no alcohol part. I'd rethink that part of it.
2006-12-15 05:45:19 · answer #8 · answered by Pink Denial 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think thats awesome. Simple and elegant are never wrong. Its you and your loves special day. enjoy and congrats
2006-12-15 04:34:53 · answer #9 · answered by cheese food product 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No alcohol served? That's boring. Other than that, it sounds great!
2006-12-15 04:35:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋