Lets say in gulf war I and in Gulf war II by act of plot all the Iraqui military personel vanished and were replaced by US Military OPFOR clones braintaped with all the skills that an opfor soldier , airman what ever have support person would have.Inaddition they know how to operate all iraqi systems .Plus the abilty to speak arabic and persian.The opfor clones are also brainwashed to fight for it Iraq . The OPFOR clones have only access to what Iraq would normaly have .
Any difference in the outcome and or the instensity of the fighting .
OPFOR -they have US agressesor style airforce /navy type pilots (think top gun and red flag) as well
2006-12-15 03:50:47 · 2 answers · asked by bolounit1 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Generally speaking, OPFOR is better trained and experienced than the contemporary units they are tasked to train. In your hypothetical, it would not matter what language, equipment, or geographic location used, the TTP's would be different, and the fight would be very different than the (poorly trained) insurgents we see now.
2006-12-15 04:00:39 · answer #1 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with Shawn. Yes OPFOR in NTC or anywhere else would kick our butts. You also have to understand that OPFOR follow a protocol. When have you ever seen an OPFOR soldier kill themselves. So technically speaking, your scenario is what is followed. But as we all military people know protocol is not the consistency.
The problem that arises today downrange is not protocol but us having to ever change our SOPs.
2006-12-15 12:21:43 · answer #2 · answered by Gilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋