English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Check it out:

http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/88?ad=d0

2006-12-15 03:32:17 · 14 answers · asked by vehement_chemical 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

The more people know about it, the faster that number will surpass one million!
Yes, it will be a good thing!

2006-12-15 03:34:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Impeachment is a legal process. No amount of petitions will get it to happen. A sitting President must commit a crime (a real crime that a regular person can also commit and be sent to jail for, like oh maybe obsrtruction of justice and perjury like Clinton) A grand jury needs to indict the President, the House needs to arrainge him, then the trial conducted by the Senate is the actual "impeachment".

2006-12-15 03:39:12 · answer #2 · answered by tabithap 4 · 1 1

the recent chief of the homestead of Representatives, the place articles of impeachment could be presented, has stated that it does no longer be a sturdy theory. it can be a distraction from fixing problems with the country. The Democrats would desire to verify a sturdy legislative record until now 2008 and that they only have next 365 days to do it until now the Presidential politicking (and criticism) kicks in. I accept as true with the homestead Speaker. P.S. most of the ideas expressed interior the petition are no longer criminal arguments--some are in basic terms opinion. extremely the hurricane Katrina subject and the supposition of election dishonesty/fraud. plenty blame for the failure of the levees is going to the shoddy shape of the levees by ability of Louisiana contractors, and scarcity of making plans for the surge going into Lake Pontrechain (sp).could there be a criminal foundation for the declare that the elections of 2000-2006 have been somewhat tampered with ? those elections have been qualified by ability of the Secretaries of State interior the country, and the election of 2000 became desperate by ability of a US appropriate court docket selection, this is the utmost court docket interior the land. there have been no lawsuits of election fraud extra forth in Ohio in 2004--in basic terms claims of fraud. I agree that the efforts to impression the election have been cheating and unethical, yet except there is information to coach it, it does not carry water in impeachment (unlawful habit). BTW i'm a Democrat.

2016-12-11 09:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There needs to be a specific charge for impeachment (i.e. purgery). Being a bad president is not an impeachable offense. If there was such a thing as a national recall election then I'd say collect as many signatures as you can. I'd even stand in front of a grocery store every day if we could recall him.

2006-12-15 03:39:49 · answer #4 · answered by scotteh8 2 · 2 0

100,000 people isn't really a lot, there are over 200 million in the US. Which mean that the petition would have less than 0.05% of voters. Who is going to push for impeachment based on that.

2006-12-15 03:38:34 · answer #5 · answered by The Teacher 6 · 0 0

Bush had a trial (absent) and found guilty of war in China. If he didn't get impeached for that, I doubt your petition will raise any eyebrows. Let's say that Bush really got only half of his votes in the 2004 election and Daddy helped him rig the other half. That would leave us with 30 million people who voted for him. Let's say that half of the people who we are assuming voted for him now regret it. That still would leave us with 15 mill. Against 100,000? You're just wasting your ink.

2006-12-15 03:55:39 · answer #6 · answered by guicho79 4 · 0 0

I'm afraid with that list of greivences they'll have to impeach more than just the president. Most everyone that holds a political office (both Rep. and Dem) are probably guilty of several of those items.

2006-12-15 03:38:28 · answer #7 · answered by SearchForTruth 2 · 0 0

Well, seeing as how they impeached our last president for lying about getting a ******* from his secretary, I think Bush certainly should be impeached. After all, he has lied to us about EVERYTHING having to do with the IRAQ war, including our reasons for starting it ("Weapons of Mass Destruction","Sponsoring Terrorism",etc") as well as our chances of "winning" (whatever that would be).

2006-12-15 03:38:45 · answer #8 · answered by heartsensei 4 · 1 0

Why is it that the people who criticize him as a president would screw up the country even more if they were president? Don't criticize someone unless you're better.

Plus, Bush is just human. He makes mistakes, just like everybody else. It is just that his mistakes were on Live Television.

So, If you can't do better, shut up.

2006-12-15 03:38:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I was going to give a thumbs down to peyton, but I agree with his last point.

2006-12-15 03:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by jinenglish68 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers