Is Darwinism the same thing as Evolution?

Question

Yes or no: explain your answer. Thanks

Answer 1

No and yes:

Darwinism is usually only meant to refer to Darwin's theory of natural selection--survival of the fittest!

Evolution is a hugely more complex concept, defined generally as a change in gene frequency in a population over time. It includes natural selection, the study of the fossil record, genetics (which didn't exist when Darwin constructed his theory), and many other aspects.

Sometimes people will refer to Darwinism as the same thing as Evolution, but for the most part, Darwinism is usually understood as a part of Evolution.

Answer 2

Yes and No. Darwinism is a term for the underlying theory in those ideas of Charles Darwin concerning evolution and natural selection (in biological systems). For the most part the term is used to decribe the particular studies that Darwin himself carried out, where as the term Evolution refers to the theories associated with modern evolutionary biology.

The term "Darwinism" is often used by creationists as a pejorative for "evolutionary biology". Casting evolution as an "ism" - a doctrine or belief - is used to strengthen arguments to mandate "equal time" for unscientific beliefs such as creationism in biology classes.

Answer 3

Darwinism is Evolution, but not all Evolution is Darwinism.

Darwinism is an early theory of Evolution that has been superceded and refined greatly since it was first proposed.

Creationists use errors in Darwinism as proof that Evolution is false. Sort of like arguing that cars aren't popular because chariots didn't have CD players....

Answer 4

Yes, however Darwinism is only the theory of the survival of the fittest, meaning that the species best adapted to survive and to reproduce the next generation will exist. Whereas evolution is theory of species changing over time and morphing into new beings. Darwinism asks why is this animal here? and evolution asks how did it arrive at its present state?

Answer 5

Darwinism is the term creationists use to describe evolution, to make it sound less scientific.

So it's pretty much the same, but modern evolutionary theory has come a long way since Darwin.

Answer 6

Is red the same thing as color?

No, red is a color, but most color is not red.

Darwinism is to color what red is to evolution.

Got that?

All evolution means is that things change over time. Darwinism explains why living things change over time.
You can accept or reject the idea of "survival of the fittest"
becuase of all living things on earth, none has ever had an ancestor that did not pass its genetic make-up on to the next generation, even if slightly mutated from the generation before.

Answer 7

No. Evolution has gone far beyond what Darwin wrote. The fields of genetics and molecular genetics have become integral in evolutionary theory since Darwin's time.

Answer 8

Yes and no: Darwinism can either mean the ideas of evolution and natural selection applied to other areas, such as economics, or it can just be a pejorative way of describing evolution, usually by creationists.

Answer 9

there's a distinction. Charles Darwin revealed the beginning of the species, and it truly is contents and his next comments were then used by human beings of the day to espouse Darwinism. maximum of what he wrote and reported holds authentic for Evolution immediately, yet we've hence more desirable a extra complete idea of Evolution. it continues to be authentic to say that Darwin or Darwinism is the daddy of the concept of Evolution. it continues to be a idea, which ability it replaced right into a hypothesis that ought to no longer be disproved scientifically. using nature of the concept it has no longer change right into a regulation, like the guidelines of Thermodynamics. This confuses some yet is scientifically maximum impressive. and that i ask your self how lots of those who disbelieve it, have a organic breed of puppy, or roses of their backyard? To paraphrase yet another, it truly is ironic that the bible-belt replaced into the first to conform pest immune to DDT. at the same time as our anti-biotics no longer artwork I completely assume to hearken to that it truly is the artwork of God, and nicely it ought to nicely be, even with the undeniable fact that the approach he makes use of will be evolution. (edit) Dividing the evolution into idea and procedure is only a cop-out. the entire element is getting messed round by those who in no way somewhat understood it contained in the first position. Evolution immediately is obtrusive, what we comprehend from the previous is scientifically precise. they're an same element, till you are able to dissprove it. It does no longer neccesarily contain taking it all the way down to at least one problem-free root, purely exhibits it. Multi disciplinary technology continues to be contained in the technique of discovery - so in case you want to dividing into 'idea' and 'procedure', then initiate speaking about 'idea' and 'hypothesis'. yet i'd particularly you call it something else entirely.

Answer 10

Yes AND no, but mostly no.

The term "Darwinism" is often used by creationists as a pejorative for "evolutionary biology". Casting evolution as an "ism" — a doctrine or belief — is used to strengthen arguments to mandate "equal time" for unscientific beliefs such as creationism in biology classes. However "Darwinism" is also used without derogatory connotations by evolutionary scientists in countries such as the UK. A notable example of a scientist who uses the term in a positive sense is Richard Dawkins.

Darwinism may also refer to a specific strand within evolutionary biology, dealing with the mechanism of natural selection, which Darwin studied, as opposed to evolutionary processes that were unknown in Darwin's day, such as genetic drift and gene flow. It may also refer specifically to the role of Charles Darwin as opposed to others in the history of evolutionary thought — particularly contrasting Darwin's results with those of earlier theories such as Lamarckism or later ones such as the modern synthesis.

from Wikipedia