English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Nearly every question I see in this section starts something like this...

"To Christians, why do you suck..."
"To Atheists, you're retarded..."

Or some other such nonsense. I think Yahoo! should make a whole new section just for all you idiots to fight in.

2006-12-14 16:42:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I am referring to the conflict between both. Not just Atheists against Christians but also Christians against Atheists/EVERYONE. So to the person who said I suck, SHUT YOUR UGLY FACE.

2006-12-14 16:53:41 · update #1

14 answers

I am a born again Christian and i love everyone God made everyone different for a reason He could of made me be a pencil who I'm i to condemn anyone.i have no right to condemn anyone i don't care who they are

2006-12-14 16:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by lovj 2 · 1 0

i think of motives why maximum religious human beings hate it whilst atheists are in this section is using the fact some [no longer all] has a tendency to make relaxing of religion. I advise, it incredibly is okay in case you come and say "Why do you believe in God? medical study has shown that [insert actuality right here]...." or arise with any clever element to talk approximately yet to easily communicate approximately something like 'Flying Spaghetti Monster' just to spite theists up is organic disrespect. all and sundry has distinctive sensitivities, some individuals are offended by using racial jokes, some are no longer, some human beings choose to no longer communicate approximately their ineffective relatives contributors, some do etc. all and sundry needs to verify to understand human beings's limitations and sensitivities. :) of direction, the theists have additionally shown disrespect to others like forcing their faith upon others etc., that I won't deny [rarely in recent times, nevertheless, whether you're, you may continuously say you're no longer involved or something, they are not going to shoot you or kill you, a minimum of no longer in Western international places] yet whilst the so 'morally spoke of as atheists' [who thinks us, religious human beings, as uncivilised and morally retarded] thinks that when a individual did undesirable stuff to you, you ought to respond back an analogous [or worse], then, the respond for the bonus question is that it relies upon on the folk, incredibly than ideals a individual beholds.

2016-10-05 08:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you are referring to just the ad hominem attacks, I could not agree more. But some of us are trying to add some substance to the debates, and I would hate for the intelligent open minded people to lose ground, just because some on this board never matured beyond elementary school playground bickering.

2006-12-14 16:52:22 · answer #3 · answered by Mad Maxine 4 · 1 0

No, that's not necessary. There are other religions in here as well. Christians and Atheists just have the most fun with irritating each other.

2006-12-14 16:51:50 · answer #4 · answered by quietwater 4 · 0 0

Maybe they should just have an "Atheist's rag on all religion" section.. hosted by Bill Mahr

2006-12-14 16:46:13 · answer #5 · answered by the_buccaru 5 · 2 1

I agree. Both groups are rigid, dogmatic, judgemental and negative. They shouldn't fight, they should get a room.

2006-12-14 16:45:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

as if atheists are the only persons that christians attack regularly.

give me a break.

2006-12-14 16:47:22 · answer #7 · answered by jen1981everett 4 · 2 1

An idiot is an idiot whether one claims to be a Christian or not.

2006-12-14 16:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by ThomasR 4 · 1 0

Not change it, just make a new category. Cause yeah... that's pretty much the way it is.

2006-12-14 16:46:00 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

No they should change it to the gay ministers in Colorado section.

2006-12-14 16:45:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers