English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-14 16:19:06 · 6 answers · asked by matt_sorrentino 1 in Environment

6 answers

Yes it does. If you design a building that uses up a lot of energy (ie thermal leakage, over dependence on air conditioning etc) it is likely that it will use more carbon fuel. If you get a lot of houses or buildings that use up a lot of energy, more fuel gets burnt in order to produce more electricity, and of course this results in more CO2 emmisions which impacts global warming. Designing car dependent housing encourages people to drive more and thus also creates more pollution, LA's suburbs are a classic example. Architecture students today are learning about ways to reduce thise energy consumption, either through high tech or low tech solutions. Some of these solutions include solar shading, green roofs, water recycling, geothermal and solar energy. Poorly designed buildings can also destroy the environment. For example, if you clear the topsoil to build a building without replanting the leftover areas you cleared, it might lead to detrimental soil erosion. So yes, architecture DOES impact global warming and the environment!

2006-12-15 22:48:13 · answer #1 · answered by hinnong 2 · 0 0

The "archetecture", or design of a building does have an impact on both global warming and the environment. Buildings that are energy efficient and well designed have a far smaller negative impact than buildings that require larg amounts of energy and resources to be built and maintained.

2006-12-14 18:45:14 · answer #2 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 0 0

No architecture is just the design behind a building, and architect may never have a building erected. Also there are many architects who consider the global impact of a project and work on reducing the amount of harm that it does to the enviroment

2006-12-14 16:27:18 · answer #3 · answered by White Lightning 2 · 0 1

Choice of materials has a large impact, eg concrete contributes a lot of Co2, local earth blocks a lot less

Demand for roads & private transport by out of town development.

Running costs, large buildings need more heating. Provision of natural light, rainwater harvesting reduces energy needed to pump water etc...

2006-12-14 21:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by fred 6 · 0 0

My name is Rafael Lomena. I write from Alicante (Spain). I am independent investigator on the Accelerated Global Heating and want to share with all something that can turn out from interest to fight this phenomenon.
My complete report is in: http://inicia.es/de/rlv/clim.htm
If they do not understand the Spanish they can use the automatic translator that will find in the main page of site:
http://inicia.es/de/rlv
Thanks to all.
(* This message has been translated with a translation software)

2006-12-14 22:13:36 · answer #5 · answered by ELPATRON 2 · 0 0

yes

2006-12-14 16:21:25 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers