English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-14 14:28:01 · 14 answers · asked by Asilos Magdalena 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Jeff C, how do explain a lot of creationist scientists turning their backs on this evidence? It's a dead-end.

2006-12-14 14:36:05 · update #1

14 answers

The socalled evidence about mans fossiles were in same layer as dinosours.....is apes & pre-current man details..

If creationists insist on dinosours & man existing at same time, then the most accept that adam & eve were not created by god, or that GOD created other humans before adam/eve,

Its a fact that dino's were much earlier than man, or at least earlier than thinking man - ape man maybe not.

2006-12-22 04:54:33 · answer #1 · answered by pcreamer2000 5 · 0 0

Actually Darwin's theory is wrought with so many holes that even he, himself agreed it was flawed. Scientists are now questioning the actual age of the earth as well as the means used to determine it..
When presented with a comparison of supported facts comparing evolution with the creation theory it's amazing how little Darwinism has to prove anything.
We are all taught in the school systems one specific way of thinking...we are literally brainwashed into believing a set of (in some cases) illogical facts, whereas (aside from a few discrepancies) creationism has a great deal of provable information if one would take the time to study the possibilities.
Don't prove to me there is a God, prove to me there isn't.

2006-12-14 14:40:32 · answer #2 · answered by Tanina 2 · 0 1

sure dinosaurs existed with human beings, dinosaur footprint state park down in texas has fossilized human footprints interior dinosaur footprints. they are stated in the Bible. and radio carbon courting would not paintings. The very regulations in the back of radio carbon courting proves that the earth is below 10,000 years previous. the idea in the back of radio carbon courting is in case you degree the carbon in the ambience and than degree the carbon in the fossil then you actually can determine the age of the fossil by using counting how a lot less carbon is in the fossil. you word, carbon detiorates by using the years, the 0.5 life of carbon is someplace round 5700 years. So if a fossil has 0.5 as a lot carbon because the preasent stages it really is going to be about 5700 years previous. the concern is that more desirable carbon is being pumped into our environment on a daily basis. And its detiorating on a daily basis, yet at a slower fee than the speed that its entering. Eventualy we are going to attain a element of carbon-14 which will equilize so as that were gaining a similar quantity that were dropping. at that element carbon datiing will be realatively precise. And at the same time as will that element be? The most excellent scientist in this field declare that a planet like ours ought to equilize about 10,000 years after its concept. yet in the finest hundred or so years that we were measuring carbon-14 it has persisted to pass up. meaning our earth hasn't reached the ten,000 365 days birthday yet. Oh, and by using how, living snails carbon date at having died about 2700 years in the past. Freshly killed seal carbon dates at having died 1700 years in the past. the moral of this tidbit? once you note of the age of a few thing carbon courting would not paintings. yet once you opt to go back up with a very previous age for some thing than carbon courting is meant to be ideal... someone is mendacity to you

2016-10-18 07:43:41 · answer #3 · answered by benavidez 4 · 0 0

That not true. I believe the earth has been here forever. Genesis 1: 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Nobody know when the beginning was. The sun was not created until the four day so how coul anybody tell time? Genesis 1: 14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

2006-12-14 14:37:54 · answer #4 · answered by Ray W 6 · 0 2

If you call someone who doesn't believe in God an athiest, what do you call a Christian who doesn't believe dinosaurs existed? A lot of religious people dismiss paleontology as nonsense.

2006-12-14 14:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 2 0

Not all Creationists are Young Earthers. But quite a few are.

BTW, Jeff: The "tracks" you are talking about are revealed here: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_track_controversy

2006-12-14 14:33:10 · answer #6 · answered by Scott M 7 · 1 1

Yes. In fact,there is evidence of dino tracks in the same layer of bedrock as human footprints found in Texas,among other places.Evolutionists turn their collective backs to this strong evidence(and many others) against their lie .

2006-12-14 14:32:00 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff C 4 · 0 2

Not everyone. Just depends.
Many people are Theists who believe in God and not necessarily evolution.

2006-12-14 14:36:48 · answer #8 · answered by . 7 · 1 0

Around 5000 BC dinosaurs broke their peace pact with man and waged war against us. Then we drove them underground where they became fossils, or Morlocks. One of those.

2006-12-14 14:30:52 · answer #9 · answered by Atlas 6 · 1 3

This phenomenon is called "delusion".

2006-12-14 14:41:28 · answer #10 · answered by =_= 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers