English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

... Isn't it interesting that suddenly Bush has decided he won't be rushed into making decisions about Iraq. Would it not have been nice if he had thought a little before lying to the cpuntry and getting us into this never ending fiasco? I wonder, does he stop to think just how many of our service personel are dying while he is " thinking".. Kind of like Nero fiddling as Rome burned. Get off the pot Bush and do something right for a change. Take some advice and stop acting like a spoiled school boy who wants his own way all the time. Don' t worry about your so called legacy.. you have it... you will go down in history as the worst president this country has ever had... what more do you want?

2006-12-14 13:55:11 · 9 answers · asked by Debra H 7 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

Now just hold on!! You should know that he always goes with his "gut feelings", with everything that has happened since Nov 7th, I can understand if he has a tummy ache and just doesn't know how to read his poor gut anymore. Like is it telling him that "maybe I did goof with Iraq" or is it just having too much mustard on that turkey hoagie he had. So he needs time to sort out his gut feelings! Just have patience, what's another few weeks of our guys and gals paying the price.

2006-12-14 14:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by malmapus 2 · 1 0

Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

The time to take care of Iraq had long since passed when President Bush invaded. For 10 years, Saddam Hussein thumbed his nose at the United Nations and at the world, interfering with the U.N. inspections and barring them altogether.

Not long before the war, a U.N. inspection team found some missiles that Saddam was not permitted to have under the U.N. resolutions he signed to stop the invasion of is country in 1991. At first, he put up a token resistance to getting rid of the missiles, but too quickly changed his mind. Anybody bent on being the big dog in the neighborhood would not give up their most powerful weapon so easily.

We have not found any great stockpiles of WMDs. How many of you remember when the U.S. military found entire jets buried in the sands of the Iraqi desert, well protected and completely air-worthy? If they can hide an entire squadron of planes in the sand, why not containers of biological weapons and such?

All I hear from the left is how many soldiers are dying. How conveniently the left forgets how many soldiers died EVERY DAY during Vietnam, WWI and WWII. No soldier's death is a good thing, but, unfortunately, it is a part of military service. You wonder how many soldiers die while Bush is "thinking". How many innocent children are killed in the streets everyday because of drugs and gang violence while the city fathers of this nation are "thinking" of how to spend our hard earned tax dollars????

Talk to the soldiers if you want to know how they feel about Iraq and whether or not we should be there. I mean, talk to them directly. Don't listen to what the news organizations tell you because they are going to take the answers and spin it the way they want it. The only soldiers that don't want to be there are the spoiled brats that never heard the word "NO" in their years growing up and never got their butts paddled for disobeying.

One final note: You left wing liberals consistently call President Bush the worst president ever. I feel quite honestly that his predecessor was the worst president and never should have been allowed to run for office in the first place, seeing as he was a draft dodger that went to the Soviet Union during Vietnam to protest American involvement there and TWICE renounced his U.S. citizenship. He came into office on the heels of President George H.W. Bush who left the Whitehouse with a growing economy. He left the office with the economy sliding downhill fast, not to mention that he and his cohorts trashed the Whitehouse and took items that they did not bring with them.

2006-12-14 23:52:37 · answer #2 · answered by SSG M 2 · 0 0

Oh I disagree, in one respect, they did think lomg and hard about starting the war in Iraq, they were committed for at least a year before its start. But the thinking was not about whether they should or not - or the potential consequences, but about how the American public would be manipulated into going along with it if not actively supporting it. Very much like what is happening now, the decison has already been made to unveil cosmetic chnages in the 'stay the course' mode. The only problem is how are they going to manipulate the US population into buying the 'new' plan - they are probably burning the midnight oil coming up with a new jingoistic slogan as we speak,

2006-12-14 22:04:15 · answer #3 · answered by Hayley 2 · 4 0

Bush is an idiot, or a very evil man..

I don't know whether he is doing all this on purpose or by his stupidity... Because I don't think anyone can be this stupid unless they are brain dead, which case I don't know why USA would elect a retard twice in a row... Wow this guy is a VERY INSECURE little man, he is always trying to take away the freedom or breaking the Constitution for some security aka Patriot Act.

Nvm, I'm just too tired to go on..

2006-12-14 22:14:09 · answer #4 · answered by Shadowfox 4 · 1 1

bush thinking is like a ship sinking,hes dead in the water with one
finger left to show,and its probably the middle finger because that's what hes been doing since his first day in office!

2006-12-14 22:15:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Too much is not enough, as long as there is money to be made, the Irag war will go on, and other than that I think you've said "it" very well

2006-12-14 22:01:21 · answer #6 · answered by razor 5 · 5 1

The Decider can't decide

2006-12-14 22:09:02 · answer #7 · answered by rosbif 6 · 1 0

You are exactly right.
He wants to think ... NOW!
How can it be that we get the government we deserve?

2006-12-14 22:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by murphy 5 · 0 1

amen ...... i couldn't have said it better. with chaos emerging from stability and truth emerging from fiction ........ it's mind boggling ...... HOW CAN ANYONE STILL SUPPORT THIS FOOL?

2006-12-14 22:04:04 · answer #9 · answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers