Seeing that macro-evolution has been disproven SCIENTIFICALLY, is there a possible better theory for the origin of things besides "God created it"? That IS supported by science?
2006-12-14 12:11:11 · 20 answers · asked by Jeff- <3 God <3 people 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In science, there is not such thing as "microevolution" and "macroevolution". There is only evolution.
Please tell me what natural process STOPS the evolutionary process at the so-called "microevolution" level. I'd really like someone to explain this scientifically.
2006-12-14 12:15:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I would Google it if I were you; I have read an article on what you are saying it was in a scientific magazine but do not remember enough about it to quote it.
As for the others they should realize that Darwinian evolution is a theory not a fact, in science nothing is concretely one way or another until it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Let us not operate with such conviction =)
2006-12-14 20:28:04 · answer #2 · answered by Crayola 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Man this is tough stuff. But the answer is no. There was a theory many years ago about earth being seeded by Martians or other space travelers, but I think it died.
Have you looked at modeling? It works evolution pretty hard, with little results, but creation does well.
2006-12-14 20:22:47 · answer #3 · answered by Terrence J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, creationism IS supported by science. For a good read that will blow your mind, try "The Evolution Cruncher" by Vance Ferrell.
Geology supports the idea that there was a worldwide Flood that killed most of the dinosaurs. Biology proves that animals only bring forth after their own kind. There are laws in the universe controlling chemistry, physics and mathematics that are so complex as to virtually prove the existence of a Higher Intelligence. I used to be an atheist/evolutionist for 20 years until I viewed a 15-hour seminar on Creation Science that totally changed my POV.
2006-12-14 20:20:57 · answer #4 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Will your god punish you for lying?
There is no proof of any sort that Evolution is not correct.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics does not disprove evolution, because the earth and life IS NOT A CLOSED SYSTEM! If the second law was as rigied as you imply it is, ice, crystals, and biologic growth could not occur.
Which is more complex an acorn or a giant Oak Tree?
As long as energy is available from an outside source things can become more complex.
2006-12-14 20:15:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm sooooo glad you pointed this out. I say this too. Isn't it wonderful? They say that Atheists are the ones who have to go by faith now; not those who believe. we're the ones who have proof now! They're also saying that the Darwin theory might be the biggest mistake in scientific history!
2006-12-14 20:21:40 · answer #6 · answered by booellis 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Macro evolution hasNOT been disproved scientifically. However, the God did it in 6 days hteory HAS been disproved hundreds of times. Get an education.
2006-12-14 20:17:48 · answer #7 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
rofl. Since when is macroevolution disproven? Seriously, give me a science link (not something drummed up by Christian bias) and we'll talk.
It hasn't been disproven.
2006-12-14 20:20:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
when was it disproven? lol. disproving is not possible in science because things get discovered as time goes by...
dont read the holey bible.
2006-12-14 20:21:34 · answer #9 · answered by Pisces 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I must have missed that one. It seems that Science and Nature missed the biggest news item in science for the century. Please cite your source. Psychotic delusions are not sources.
2006-12-15 01:31:15 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋