http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l130/wukalar7/Summer2006029.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l130/wukalar7/Summer2006077.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l130/wukalar7/Summer2006107.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l130/wukalar7/Summer2006115.jpg
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l130/wukalar7/Summer2006123.jpg
2006-12-14 11:30:18 · 5 answers · asked by Andrew T 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
Well to be correct with the question, yes they are good for someone so young. The rest are okay, but the last one had the "element" of photography.
2006-12-15 10:05:55 · answer #1 · answered by kevin p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't like these kinda questions, so I'll try to answer it tactfully..
They are pictures taken by a 12 year old. There is nothing to them spectacular, special, unique, identifiable, etc.
Fortunately, scenic photos are the 2nd easiest thing to photograph and still turn out beautiful (even if you don't know what the lense is on a camera).
2006-12-14 19:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ipshwitz 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am not an expert, but I thought they were quite good for someone that young.
2006-12-15 01:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by Cracker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like all of them except for the first one. but for someone your age you are on the right road. there nice pics.
2006-12-15 08:17:44 · answer #4 · answered by live forever 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes... ; )
2006-12-14 15:59:29 · answer #5 · answered by HJ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋