Anyone who hasn't considered this as a theory to how DNA first appeared on our tiny planet in a vast galaxy is an idiot. I'm not saying it's the correct theory, but it is a theory and people should be prepared to learn and glean knowledge from the wonderful information we have available to us now, that people didn't have for thousands of years.
2006-12-14 11:15:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The process of life going from one object to another on meteoroids or comets is called panspermia, and there are many prominent scientifists who think it happens a lot. Personally I think life probably arises fairly commonly in the Universe, judging from what happened here on Earth, but I'm not so sure that panspermia is a common event.
However, one thing I can tell you for sure is that people have not yet discovered any bacteria on Mars.
2006-12-14 11:12:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
100%. It happened. And, by the way: "Atheists typically hold that a belief in god requires turning a blind eye to all facts, science and reason, but what are the odds of life originating from non life, as calculated by scientists themselves?" NO. You are an ignorant person. An atheist says, that due to your LACK OF PROOF of the EXISTENCE OF GOD the default position is NON EXISTENCE. Being an atheist has NOTHING TO DO with evolution, the creation of life, sports scores, the start of the universe, or how many vibrators one has in their drawer. And only an IGNORANT MORON would not know that. A FINAL THOUGHT ON YOUR REFERENCE: Coppedge, James, F. 1973. Evolution: Possible or impossible? is the same: James Fletcher Coppedge, founder of the Rangers and Christian Commandos and the Valley Cathedral Youth Center. Not a reliable source on Evolution.
2016-05-24 06:14:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a good question, the possibility of life in other planets, basic forms or advance forms its huge, we dont know how big is the universe and his time, we are only a fragment or a second, we know life forms advace life forms like dinossaurs lived in our planet before we did a planet with the same conditions or even worst conditions can stand other type of beeings, its evolution that made who we are, but who realy built all this who was the arquitec, are we an accident? probably
2006-12-14 11:25:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by 000000k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it has to have started somewhere, right? And if it can start once, what's to say it can't start again in a similar fashion somewhere else?
Anyway, it makes since. Life, evolution, etc. is all built on a simple premise: If something is better at making more of itself, there will be more of it. thus, make since that something that gains the ability to reproduce will spread. Hence, life.
2006-12-14 11:13:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Star F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it has been proven that bacteria have lived on Mars.
In my opinion, although it is possible life could have been transmitted to earth, it only pushes the problem further away: where did that life come from.
I think the early earth had sufficient environmental resources to develope the first replicating molecules.
2006-12-14 11:12:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possible. Who knows. Interesting theory.
2006-12-14 11:13:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you're wrong callmetamu, i wouldn't be surprised if bacterial spores or like could survive space and re-entry deep inside of a meteorite/comet etc..
2006-12-14 11:13:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's certainly been thought of. Look up panspermia. Of course, it doesn't answer the question of how life began, just shifts the origin.
2006-12-14 11:10:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It's impossible: re-entry would cause any bacteria to burn up in the atmosphere, not to mention they would be unlikely to survive the radiation in outer space (and of course you might have issues with it being too COLD).
2006-12-14 11:10:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋