2006-12-14 10:18:57 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
He was just an angry little man jumping on the band-wagon. Totalitarianism was already on the rise, so of course he joined up. Then he chose the world's oldest scapegoat: the Jews.
2006-12-14 10:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by Shamudog 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No Hitler was a disgrace to the army. The only reason that he was actually Id'ed with the army because of his mustard gas injury
2006-12-14 18:21:03 · answer #2 · answered by Briddy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stalin was MUCH worse. Hitler was small potatoes compared to Stalins impressive 33 million death toll.
2006-12-14 22:01:41 · answer #3 · answered by rx_78_2_1983 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For a madman with the clap.....he didn't do bad for himself. It teaches us not to trust little corporals,for one day they might start something that will cost 25million lives.Could the term "grand" be substituted with dink?
2006-12-14 18:24:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO!!!!
He was 1 of the most evil people in history! What an absurd question!
2006-12-14 18:24:16 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ill give him one thing; he was a militarial genious. But rest assure, hes rotting in hell right as we speak.
2006-12-14 18:40:49 · answer #6 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no he was a murderer! he had killed millions of people. oh my gosh, are you sure you didnt know this. oh my, dont get me started agin. i already went nuts over native americans last night. wow, merry christmas.
2006-12-14 18:21:46 · answer #7 · answered by chrystal 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've heard he could be charming in person, but he was a maniac.
2006-12-14 18:21:24 · answer #8 · answered by Rockvillerich 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was a dog lover.
2006-12-14 18:36:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you a tad daft?
2006-12-14 18:24:05 · answer #10 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋