Seriously. I'm talking one on one fisticuffs. No holds barred. No weaponry, just pure brawl. Give me reasons as to why you believe one over the other. Most convincing reason will take the 10 points.
P.S. I know who I think would win, but that doesn't mean your answer has to match mine to win the argument.
2006-12-14 09:43:14 · 7 answers · asked by Kyle 2 in Sports ➔ Boxing
Okay, Baseball girl, your answer gave no real reasons as to why W. would win in a PHYSICAL fight. This is not a political question.
2006-12-14 10:05:05 · update #1
Not to mention, Bush isn't really a Texan, seeing as he grew up in the North East (Connecticut I believe), or a rancher (just owning a gigantic Ranch and clearing brush in front of the cameras, all while never riding a horse because you're afraid of horses doesn't make you a rancher).
2006-12-14 10:16:37 · update #2
I want you to base it purely on physical attributes. i.e. W. would win because he lifts everday and can curl 40lb dumbbells and bench 250lbs. OR Kerry would win... he's tall, has a better reach, has a reputation for being tough, was a swift boat commander, I saw his biceps when he was windsurfing, etc.... kind of like how you said his wiry strength might win it for him. That kind of stuff.
2006-12-14 10:23:36 · update #3
Look at the question as if I just asked about 2 celebrities, i.e., who would win in a fight between Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, and why?
2006-12-14 10:28:17 · update #4
DUBYA WOULD MAKE A LOT OF BAD DECISIONS AND KERRY WOULD MAKE A FEW BAD JOKES.
A MAJORITY DRAW WITH THE SUPREME COURT OVER TURNING THE OUTCOME AND AWARDING THE BOUT TO DUBYA.
2006-12-18 00:51:06 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has that swagger and single-minded persistence that all great fighters must possess, but if the brawl descends into a chaotic free-for-all, he may not be able to adapt. Kerry has wiry-strong length, but it should be mostly neutralized by his tendency to waffle. His secret weapon may be his ability to talk his opponent to sleep, but it's unlikely Dubya would be listening. Ultimately I think Dubya's tenacity beats the bleeding heart out of wishy-washy Kerry. Of, course, McCain would kick both their asses.
EDIT: Kyle, you ask a question about two people who last ran for president and don't think it's political??? What are we supposed to base our answers on - their past win-loss records in brawls?
2006-12-14 10:03:47 · answer #2 · answered by linus501 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
George W Bush!! Don't mess with Texas. Bush is a Texan, a rancher, a good ol' boy. Kerry is a wuss who ran from war. He's a waffler. Can't seem to take a stand and hold it. Bush stands firm and doesn't back down from whatever he takes a stand on.
2006-12-14 09:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by BaseballGrrl 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fearless Leader b/c he might cry to Cheney for aid. Cheney might name in Rice who might seek advice with Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld might advise an all out nuclear assault on Kerry with WMD in lieu of a fist combat. W might push the button -- not more Kerry. Chicken hawks win once more!
2016-09-03 13:29:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a coward. Kerry is a Vietnam war veteran. Kerry is a tough man. Kerry wins.
2006-12-14 18:06:21 · answer #5 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dubya would knock Kerry out in the 1st minute of round #3.
2006-12-14 11:33:36 · answer #6 · answered by robert m 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Dubya
2006-12-14 16:36:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋