why or why not?
2006-12-14 05:37:50 · 26 answers · asked by bubbles_n_ar 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
i have two, but want more..
2006-12-14 05:46:57 · update #1
Yes they are completely sexy. It shows there indepence and there free will. A tat shows the character of the person who picked it and is wearing is. Plus the postion of a tat is very sexy on a woman as well.
2006-12-14 06:38:20 · answer #1 · answered by The Plague 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would not say that they are sexy at all, but I can see some of them as expressions of a person's individuality. Woman that have their whole back covered looks awful in my opinion or their sleeves done. My fiance has a small celtic knot on her lower back and it does not look too bad. She just had a vine with her three sons put on the nape of her neck, wanted to put it on her leg but we negotiated as I was against it came up with the neck. As we age these same tats that look so young and fresh on all these teens and early 20's today will someday not look so fine when they are either getting on in years and/or wanting to work in a profession where they will not be viewed as attractive. I believe that within the next ten years that the busiest business to be in will be the laser tattoo removal business.
2006-12-14 05:44:08 · answer #2 · answered by crazylegs 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't like any tattoos on a woman. A tattoo looks and feels to me like an object that stands between me and the woman. When I touch a tattoo, I feel like I'm touching an object instead of a real person.
2006-12-14 05:48:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. When I was growing up, tattoos were what hard, trampy women and sailors had. I don't see what's "sexy' about a blurred fairy or a smudge little butterfly embedded in someone's skin. Or a 40 year old woman with Mickey Mouse on her sagging left boob.
2006-12-14 05:41:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely NOT! Because it's not classy, when you put on an after five gown and go somewhere don't look very elegant with a tattoo on your body and besides when you get old and become wrinkled you have to look at those marks you put on your body for the rest of your life.
2006-12-14 05:41:36 · answer #5 · answered by MrsE 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To some maybe...to me, absolutely not...
It equates to graffiti on a nice fence or on the side of a building.
Why in heavens name would a woman, with beautiful eyes, skin and smile, would ever want to deface themselves...
Ask yourself this question...would flowers ever be attractive with tattoos on them...
2006-12-14 05:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by Paul J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they can be. But when a woman has a tattoo across her lower back. It's the international sign for slvt.
2006-12-14 05:41:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lame!!!! Why do you want to be like everyone else. Let me guess you want something that "means something" pppfffttt. Almost 40% of Americans now have a tat don't be another trendy follower and if you do get one might as well make it a sheep because that's all you are.
2006-12-14 05:42:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It all depends on what they are and where they are put. I have one that does not show unless I want it to. To me hidden ones are sexy, those that everyone can see are not.
2006-12-14 05:40:59 · answer #9 · answered by mayihelpyou 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They are trashy. Why would a girl want to get something permanently put on her body that she will hate in 10 years.
2006-12-14 05:45:58 · answer #10 · answered by bam_du1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋