One doesn't have anything to do with the other. Your analogies are confused.
Smoking affects not only the smoker but all those around him/her.
You could probably contact the American Lung Association to find out how many people have died in the 20th century and in the 21st century of smoking related illnesses. There may be quite a few-
2006-12-14 04:39:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lizzie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, no. People aren't blown up because of religion. The actions you're referring to have nothing to do with religion; they're about political and economic oppression more than anything.
Yes, being blown up is even unhealthier than smoking, but what, exactly, are you getting at?
Blowing people up is illegal; smoking is not. People who blow up people are harming others; smokers who smoke outside, alone, and among other smokers do not.
2006-12-14 05:30:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Uh, you realize smoking is INHERENTLY unhealthy, no? There's no way you can do it or practice it that would make it healthier. But the ppl who blow themselves and others in the name of their religion are the ones with serious problems. Itself not the religion that's the problem; it's the ppl who practice it...
2006-12-14 04:40:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a strange theory...
Seems like you're defending smoking over religion. Violence is wrong no matter what the reason. And smoking is just stupid and disgusting.
2006-12-14 04:44:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥michele♥ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You show me someone who has blown up from cigarette smoke and I'll show you the multi million dollar ad campaign slogan for the cancer association.
2006-12-14 04:38:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exploding is quicker than the results of smoking.
2006-12-14 04:38:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by a_delphic_oracle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think your question is being blown out of proportion.
2006-12-14 04:40:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Edward J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right but we are not supposed to talk about it.
2006-12-14 04:40:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by The professor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So what's your point?
2006-12-14 04:38:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eso_ uk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋