There were horrible atrocities committed, but there are questions based on factual discrepencies that do warrant a reexamination of the Holocaust:
Why do the Jews' own figures for their total European population pre and post Holohoax not show a fall in numbers?
How can the 'confessions' from the Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal be regarded as authentic when according to Allied doctors who examined the German prisoners many of them had been tortured ?
How can confessions which state that Jews were variously steamed to death, gassed by non poisonous diesel exhaust fumes,beaten to death by pedal powered clubbing machines, electrocuted 25,000 at a time on giant metal plates and vaporised by a 'death ray' be regarded as evidence?
Why is the confession of the Auschwitz camp commandant written in English, a language he did not understand, and why are the pages spattered with blood?
How could the Germans have gassed one million jews at Auschwitz in 'chambers' which could never have functioned? Why would these chambers be designed so that they would have discharged highly explosive and toxic Hydrocyanic gas right under the naked flames of the camp crematoria and next to the commandants quarters? Did the Germans wish to poison themselves and blow the entire camp apart?
Why did the Simon Wiesenthal Centre exhibit a photograph on its website showing smoke coming from a 'crematorium' which was in fact airbrushed on and was coming not from a chimney but a fence post?
Why do 'survivors' claim to have seen smoke and flames and ashes issuing from crematorium chimneys night and day when reconnaissance photos show no smoke at all and the blueprints of the crematoria show that the chimneys were fitted with flame and smoke traps?
If there was a Concentration Camp at Treblinka where 850,000 Jews were killed then why does it not appear on wartime recconaissance photos - and why has a ground penetrating radar survey of the site revealed no foundations, no evidence of buildings and no bodies?
How did the Germans dispose of 1.1 million corpses at Auschwitz? The crematoria did not have anything like the capacity to dispose of this number.The alternative story of burning bodies in pits would have required so much petrol that the entire German war effort would have been paralysed. So how WERE the bodies disposed of?
How can 'eyewitness' tales of Jewish prisoners working as 'Sonderkommando' dragging bodies from the 'gas chambers' be true ? None of these stories mention gas masks and some even say the Sonderkommando were smoking cigarettes IN A CHAMBER FULL OF EXPLOSIVE POISONOUS GAS.
Why are so many 'survivors' tales, kept in museum archives, unavailable for public view?
If it is true that the Germans lined tens of thousands of Jews against what is called the 'shooting wall' at Auschwitz and blew their brains out then why can you visit this wall today and see for yourself that there are no bullet holes in it?
2006-12-14 02:31:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
The concentration camps were originally for political
prisoners. The Nazis, (not all Germans were Nazis),
kicked many "undesirables" out of Germany. Jewish people, Jehovah Witnesses, Gypsies, Gays.
The Communists were also kicking "undesirables" out
of Russia. These train loads of people were meeting
in the area of Poland and Austria. Many of them were
dead. So they built crematoriums to dispose of dead
bodies and prevent disease.
Hitlers Final Solution was to start exterminating people.
Mostly Jewish people, as I feel he was influenced by a
document called the Protocols of Zion. Which may
have been a forgery, or really belonged to a secret order
of Sion, who felt the Tribe of Benjamin was the rightful
ruler of Jerusalem. The Protocols tell how to take over
countries by lying to the peope, and destroying their
ecomony and things.
I'm sure others were killed too.
The pathetic shape the concentration camp prisoners
were in was due to the fact Germany couldn't even feed
it's own Army and people at the end of the war. But there were atrocities of a great magnitude. Human experiments, and cold blooded murder.
2006-12-14 02:42:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Master_of_Psyche 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is enough documented evidence both physical evidence acquired at the concentration camps at the time of their liberation and from the highly detailed Nazi records to demonstrate the holocaust against the Jews, Gypsies, Slavs and others actually took place with numbers in the 20 million range being systematically murdered.
Anyone that has tried to disprove these facts always ends up showing the rest of us just how stupid they really are.
2006-12-14 02:34:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not only do I believe it happened there is plenty of evidence to support its existence for those who have a hard time wrapping their brains around such an evil time in our human history. I think that when something this horrific happens there is always the danger of denial and a want to rewrite history. We must never forget so that this type of mass inhumanity never happens again.
2006-12-14 02:40:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Learn from the past or repeat it. Yet it seems we didn't learn because genocides are still occurring. I wonder what it will take to wake humanity up to the fact that we are all one people and killing others is wrong.
It is curious that physical courage should be so common in the world and moral courage so rare.
-Mark Twain
2006-12-14 02:47:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by thewolfskoll 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The holocaust is an historic fact. Only nutcases and antisemitic haters question it. I've SEEN the tattooed numbers on my mother in law's arm.
2006-12-14 02:35:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've visited Dachau and Auschwitz. I've spoken with survivors of the camps. I've spoken with people who saw the camps with their own eyes. I've seen the shame on the faces of people whose relatives worked the camps. I've seen the marks left on those who were imprisoned there.
I dare you to ask this question to the face of someone who "claims" to have spent time in a concentration camp. Someone who watched their friends and loved ones suffer indignation and torture.
2006-12-14 02:59:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by whtknt 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
confident. there replaced into documentation (a minimum of an entire railroad boxcar complete) of it--and THAT replaced into compiled by using the Nazis themselves. to boot, how would desire to a hoax of such proportions be performed? everyone who's ever tried to maintain a secret knows that it's going to unavoidably leak as greater individuals are enable in on it, and face it, 1000's of folk ought to have conventional approximately what replaced into occurring--the two people who have been perpetrating it and easily people who survived it. i'm particular, too, that there have been people who lived close to the concentration camps who ought to've a minimum of had suspicions of what replaced into happening, whether they saved them to themselves (given the situations, probable the prudent element to do from the attitude of survival--I each so often think of that maximum folk have a tendency to be that way, nevertheless we would desire to choose directly to think of we'd have had the braveness to talk up. If I look pointing a finger, bear in suggestions that 4 of them are pointing ideal back at at me!). nicely, i think there have been people who concept Columbus faked his voyage whilst he back to Spain, too.
2016-10-05 07:30:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not a matter of "belief". It's been documented.
The Nazis were very good record-keepers. We also have movies of the concentration camps - documentaries - from after the war. and we have the camps themselves, and so on.
And I was partly rasied by two concentration-camp survivors; I've seen the tatoos on their arms, and on the arms of friends of theirs.
2006-12-14 04:15:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Praise Singer 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everyone with a working brain knows it occurred and realize the ignorance and hate of those who deny it.
2006-12-14 02:32:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Quantrill 7
·
4⤊
0⤋