intresting, I did not know. thank you.
2006-12-14 02:08:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sunspot Baby 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Very possible. I've often thought that the extreme old age of the early Old Testament figures were probably just a difference in time-measurement between ancient and modern times. By chance, do you have any documentation based on Hebrew translations to support that?
2006-12-14 10:10:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Open Heart Searchery 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Genesis 5:5 So all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty YEARS; and he died.
The Hebrew word translated "years" is "shaneh," meaning:
1) year
a) as division of time
b) as measure of time
c) as indication of age
d) a lifetime (of years of life)
So I'm not sure why you think this.
Peace and happy holidays!
EDIT: "Jeanmarie," yes, I also have laughed at this huge irony! In fact, I have a quote by Mr. T on my Yahoo 360 page. He has a GREAT Christian witness!
2006-12-14 10:09:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Suzanne: YPA 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Or maybe Moon years (Lunar years) which are almost just under 900
2006-12-14 10:10:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Black_hole_gravity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Suzanne is right with the bible reference. They were in lunar years.
2006-12-15 09:38:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ah. That makes more sense. Darn Christians trying to annoy us!
2006-12-14 10:38:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by teh @nn0y3d kItteh (^_^) 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Proof?
2006-12-14 10:09:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ___ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wonder if as many people played Adam as they've played James Bond.
2006-12-14 10:08:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
That isn't biblical. Show reference my friend.
Did you know that Mr T is a christian?
2006-12-14 10:09:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeanmarie 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Peter Pan has lived longer than that.
2006-12-14 10:08:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋