English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sure Hitler killed a few jews, but Stalin killed over 50 million. We should have fought with Hitler against the Soviets and then used the CIA to remove Hitler after the war was won. We could have also cut a deal to save the jews and others by helping him fight the Soviets.

2006-12-14 01:04:42 · 28 answers · asked by nazilover1488 2 in Politics & Government Military

Thank you robert I thought it was also.

2006-12-14 02:05:40 · update #1

Judy, we declared war on Japan, since they had a mutual protection pact he had to declare war. Before that tho we ould have cut a cozy deal with him. Let England alone, and we help you against the Soviets and let you keep the Frogs and the rest of the eurotrash.

2006-12-14 02:06:57 · update #2

28 answers

Seeing how the Soviets were in the 20th century I have to agree with you. More lives could have been saved had we fought with Hitler to destroy the Soviets. I think FDR was a commie so that would never happen.

2006-12-14 01:16:28 · answer #1 · answered by zombiefighter1988 3 · 0 0

No deal was possible nor wanted. At the time the country was in a isolationist mood and it would have been impossible for congress to back this plan. Then the japs attacked and then Hitler and Mussolini declared war on us. The reason why it wasn't wanted was that Stalin was doing harm to his own people and thus hurting himself. In short if a commie wants to kill a commie okay by us. When Hitler betrayed Stalin we knew we had to support Stalin and keep Hitler busy while we built up our forces and it worked. As for the Morales side of this it should be known that at that time the true extent of Stalin's purges was unknown and the same can be said of the Holocaust. it wasn't until after the war that the extent of both crimes was really known.

2006-12-14 05:44:10 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 0 1

I totally agree that the US fought on the wrong side in WWII. Baruch, Morgenthau, and the Jewish bankers who controlled FDR and the USA used the US to fight Germany because Hitler and the Germans had the audacity to take Germany back from the Jews who had taken control of Germany (just as they have in the US today). In order to engage Germany in war, it was necessary for the US to blockade oil supplies going into Japan. The Japanese had less than 6 months supply of oil, and were forced to either capitulate to the US or to go to war. FDR wanted Japan to attack the US so that he could use the attack as a pretext to enter into the war against Germany. This is a bit of an oversimplification, but essentially, the US fought for the Judeo-Communist Soviet Union to preserve Jewish control of Russia and to extend communist influence into Eastern Europe and the Far East. The US-USSR victory also facilitated the mass movement of so-called Jewish refugees into Palestine. Today the US is still fighting for the Jews and Israel, only now we are murdering Muslims and Arabs instead of Germans.

2006-12-14 05:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by Misanthrope 2 · 3 0

Hitler killed a few Jews?!?!?! 6 million plus. By the time the war with the Soviet Union (as you suggest) would be over, then all the Jews would be dead and not 6 million.

Whats wrong with the world today? Really?

2006-12-14 03:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by verduneuro 2 · 0 9

Wow, you have a really good point. I think the main reason that we ended up going against Hitler was because of the fact that all the other european countries, who were US allies, were threatened by the potential overtaking of Hitler. Given that England and France were buddies with the US at the time, It makes sense we went with their side. Also, consider that Pearl Harbor was want brought the US officially in the war, a Japanesse attack. Since Japan was allied with Germany at that point, it made more sense for the US to go against Germany as well; guilt by association, if you will;instead of fighting for them. Why fight for the guy who's buddy just blew up your pacific fleet?! If Japan hadn't gotten involved with the US and Hitler's plan to take over the world didn't threaten US allies things might have turned out much differently. Consider this...had Hitler allied with the soviets instead of going against them we would all be speaking german right now...and live under a national socialist government.

2006-12-14 01:12:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You must be wrong. How did we fight on the worng side when we Won!. We went to war to stop Agression. Remember we didn't know about the killing of Jews till then end of the war. He did have a plan to kill millions of jews. He did not kill 50 million Jews however, He did have a plan to kill Jews around the WWI Era. Luckily, he died before he could carry out the killing of Jews. Stalin has killed many. Alot were people against him. The other party. A lot of them were criminals about 1 mil.

It's interesting that you bring this up. check out history how Stalin gained power, Then Look at Hitler, then look at Saddam. There is intersting similarities on their rise to power. check out the history on these losers.

2006-12-14 01:27:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

no one replaced into battling for the welfare of Jews for the duration of WW2. very few human beings outdoors the Nazi commonly used crew and camp operatives knew something about the mass homicide of jews till after the warfare.even with the reality that,for sure the international replaced into attentive to the persecution and arrests of jews. This replaced into no longer the reason of US warfare in Europe. Germany declared warfare on the u . s ..If Germany seized administration of Europe and Japan the east then the international would were a lonely position for the u . s . and invasion would were particular. Roosevelt wisely nipped the project contained in the bud by taking the warfare to its enemy. even with the undeniable fact that,you're making a valid aspect.The communists were certainly a significantly better risk than the Nazis. Stalin had 20million murders of innocents lower than his belt even before the outbreak of warfare contained in the east. For each and each and every of the purely right efforts of the allies,the Soviet Union replaced into the in problem-free words actual winner of WW2 assuming occupation or impact for the era of maximum of eastern Europe.Its darkish shadow last for the subsequent 40 years. it truly is often requested why Hitler fought on till the bitter end at the same time as defeat replaced into inevitable.maximum historians would challenge that,as a gambler,Hitler assumed that the western allies would connect him contained in the wrestle adversarial to the purple military on the purely right second after realising such would ought to surely dictate submit warfare geopolitics contained in the area. The information communicate for themselves,Stalin replaced into certainly the more effective risk.regrettably,even an alliance with the withdrawing German military would were no adventure for the purple military steamroller.

2016-11-26 02:39:11 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

So we cut a deal with Hitler and have him invade us just like he invaded the USSR. The only reason the USSR fought against Hitler was be turned on them. Hitler was a bad man that's way we fought against him. You should take a few History classes.

2006-12-14 07:18:14 · answer #8 · answered by NA 2 · 0 4

I totally disagree with you,Hitler had to be stopped,How can you say that he only killed a few Jews,s wot is wrong with you did you not learn history at school,Hitler was a wicked man and a coward,He is responsible for killing over 6 million of men woman and children,I hope that he is rotting in HELL

2006-12-14 01:11:12 · answer #9 · answered by Bella 7 · 0 3

Though, your nickname is "NaziLover", I see the logic behind your question.

Well, Stalin did kill his own 50+ million of his own people.. but the scenario at that time wouldn't allow US to be allies with Hitler since Hitler declared war on US right after pearl harbor.

But anyway, I am pretty sure things would've worked out if people used their brains instead of ......

That is all.

2006-12-14 01:16:04 · answer #10 · answered by Morad Rayyan 1 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers