English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who should have the burden of proof? The Koran? or The Bible?

Why?

2006-12-13 21:59:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

we don't have to prove the Bible, its real.
the Bible will prove itself.

2006-12-13 22:06:30 · answer #1 · answered by الحقيقة 4 · 1 3

Both will be proved as true or false. The bible says that heaven and earth declare the glory of God, But at this time many can argue that there is no God. The bible was written by men and try to show contradictions that do not really exist. I am sure those who believe the koran believe is is not full of lies and errors. The bible teaches it is by Faith that we are saved, I think it is this same faith that must be applied to the entire bible. Christians know in the end God wins.

2006-12-14 07:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by D J Honestly 2 · 0 0

Any positive assertion carries the burden of proof. Claims should not be taken at face value.

2006-12-14 06:05:43 · answer #3 · answered by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5 · 2 0

Both. Followers of both religions should know enough about their holy text to provide the burden of proof to anyone who wants to know. If you cannot justify why you believe something then you should think about why.

2006-12-14 06:05:01 · answer #4 · answered by mortgagegirl101 6 · 0 0

Any theist has the burden of proof

2006-12-14 06:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Eureka! 4 · 0 0

Hi, Mohammed took the Torah and the Christian scriptures and edited meanings here and passages there until he had his own tailored book which we know as the Koran, so it does contain some truths but not the full revealed truth of the Holy Bible, and so cannot be substituted for the Bible.

2006-12-14 06:06:33 · answer #6 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 1 3

Since they're both claiming to be messages of universal spiritual truth from the OMNIPOTENT MAKER OF THE WORLDS (TM), I'd say that the burden of proof is on both of them.

You can't assume that either one is valid. They might both be lies.

(Hint: They are.)

2006-12-14 06:03:23 · answer #7 · answered by The Man Comes Around 5 · 3 2

The proof is in the pudding

2006-12-14 06:01:21 · answer #8 · answered by defman88 1 · 3 1

Oh ,you learned a new phrase! Good for you!

2006-12-14 06:02:03 · answer #9 · answered by enslavementality 3 · 2 1

all religion , they all fall short .

2006-12-14 06:03:50 · answer #10 · answered by jsjmlj 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers