English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Bible is not one book about one religion or one people, it is a bunch of books about people in general and altogether a story that is literal in someways, but can not be understood in the most important ways based on single words or sentences, or even chapters or verses. The Story of Jesus is amazing when comprehended with imagination and spirit, but it makes little sense as a actual and complete story of the Son of God. In the first place, we can not prove that there is a God or a son of god.
So, we have to fill in the blanks, construct the life and times of Jesus in our own minds to come to terms with the real story which is certainly not word for word a representation of the absolute truth about anything except that people have always believed in Gods and sometimes even we are able to have faith in an idea or reality that somehow life works out. But the three groups of rich white men mentioned above seem blind to the richness of the story and the significants of Jesus.

2006-12-13 17:57:46 · 5 answers · asked by zclifton2 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

the problem is they have too much faith

2006-12-13 17:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by Red Eye 4 · 0 0

Your attempt at sounding intelligent in spite of your poor sentence structure, misspelled or ill-used words, and general grammatical errors, only vaguely masks your own lack of imagination, faith, and I might add open-mindedness. Your sad attempt to veil your own shortsightedness is glaringly apparent. One might ask why you are so quick to condemn, judge or criticize considering your question assumes that you do recognize the "richness of the story and the significants (sp) of Jesus". However, if indeed you did possess this understanding how do you justify your racist attitude? Your opinion that the story should be comprehended with imagination and spirit sounds like you believe that it can be construed or interpreted to fit a particular situation or justify a particular point of view. Yours, for example, which seems to be that all "religious fundamentalists, right wing conservatives and corporation boards" not only lack imagination and spirit but are all white males. Shame on you for trying to remove the mote from anothers eye while having a beam in your own. Being the imaginative, spiritual person that you are I'm sure you're familiar with that particular phrase.

2006-12-13 18:24:21 · answer #2 · answered by hairdvs 4 · 0 0

I think your assumption is wrong and comes from a lack of knowing all that many right wing conservatives, corporation board members and religeous fundementalists.

2006-12-13 18:00:56 · answer #3 · answered by sheepinarowboat 4 · 1 0

for sure the conservatives do no longer realize it. they don't have any potential for self-exam and/or philosophical evaluation. they are stuck on "Hate then Kill" speed. To the ignorant partisan hack who printed that "countless environmental communities" were to blame for homicide, you're a liar. And to target to color "liberal communities" as terrorist is insane. we are the pacifists, keep in innovations? we are those pushing international relatives - your breed is the single with a demanding-on over the nuclear bomb. you're only pis$sed off that this question is useless on the mark.

2016-10-18 06:42:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mate, all the other 'religious' people in the word belive the same about their respective books and teachings and prophets and ...

2006-12-13 18:02:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers