English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Remember he has still not found the weapons of mass destrution that he told were there in Iraq

2006-12-13 17:43:39 · 11 answers · asked by Koala 2 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

Yes probably so. The statistics from Iraq sure seem to support this idea.

2006-12-13 17:48:10 · answer #1 · answered by buffalobo 2 · 2 3

No not by a long shot. There is killing that comes from defending oneself and his friends.Which our armed forces are doing and remember they volunteered to join the service. And there is murdering on purpose to rid the world of what the Islamic fundamentalists (terrorist) call infidels that's me and you the infidel. Remember they will kill themselves just to kill others.Life here means nothing to them or very little. And they hide like cowards behind women and children when they loose their nerve. The war in Iraq is no longer about weapons of mass destruction not being found and by the way if you google weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq you might be surprised. We are in a terrible situation war sucks but do we just let them run over us? I value my little life here on earth and I want to die of natural causes not by some crazed evil following ex goat hearder. I just don't understand your logic what does the number of people that die have to do with it. Isn't the intent the real problem? If there were no terrorists we wouldn't be fighting them would we. How can you possibly even put us the United States as equal to blame for the deaths much less say we are worse! Sure innocient people die accidents happen but again we didn't start it. They did. And it's about survival of the free world. You like siting in your nice house typing on your pc don't you? While our men and women are over their fighting for your saftey. shame on you for such a shallow pathetic point of view. Sorry to unload on you but I am just sick and tired of this same old question being asked on blogs and sites all over our country. Wake up! And by the way why are you more concerned about the terrorists that we kill in the middle east then you are about the innocient citizens who die here from criminals? I hate to say but there are far more deaths here everyday by bad people then in Iraq. I hope you and the people who think like you will some day see reality for what it is. I pray for peace every day my friend and I wish you nothing but the best. but you need to get your head out of your *** and stop listening to the pointy headed liberal linguene spined intelecutals that live in a fantasy world.

2006-12-14 02:27:09 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0 1

No, the terrorists are very far ahead. Saddam killed people by the hundreds of thousands. The nerve gas reserves that we found in Iraq qualify as weapons of mass destruction ( as the liberal media ignore, and you choose to forget ).

2006-12-14 01:54:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

1. No, can you not do the math....terrorists have been serving every nation their wares for a long time....Israel has historically been the only nation to take matters into their own hands and go after their attackers. Bush has been the only american president with the balls and morals to do the same. I would like to ask you how many times I could slap you before you would hit me back?

2. Please define WMD....I personally think French fighter jets buried under the sand, capable of delivering nuclear war heads......or any other bomb for that matter is a WMD. Do you not think hundreds of bottles of biological and chemical agents that went missing is not a WMD.

2006-12-14 01:58:51 · answer #4 · answered by WitchTwo 6 · 6 2

I think so. I do not understand why he can't pull his head out of his back-end and figure things out the right way. He needs to stop trying to be stubborn about this whole thing. Pretty soon, by his sending more troops over there, there will be no more men to defend our country. It is time to end the da** war!!

2006-12-14 01:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by EvPet 1 · 2 3

What about the innocent people at the world trade centers,pentagon and those who died in Pa?WHAT ABOUT THOSE INNOCENT PEOPLE YOU F*U*C*K*I*N*G A*S*S.I am getting sick of hearing about the innocent people our troops kill..,what about the 200 plus marines that died in Beruit?????What about the damn children they strap bombs to?????They have killed more of their own people than our troops have..,and freaking idiotic comments like that is the same as calling our troops murders.Go feuck yourself moron.

Oh and your weapons of mass..,here it is:http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

2006-12-14 01:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by halfbright 5 · 3 2

actually the majority of killing of civilans is being done by
militias and terrorists in thier suicide bombings...which is
not different really then what was going on under hussien.

2006-12-14 01:49:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Try to understand man! He is searching oil instead of weapons

Garacaius, by the way, latest weapons like mother of bomb, chemical weapons etc were not in Saddam’s team. Please wait for final score Bush is playing his inning and Saddam’s is over.

2006-12-14 02:02:21 · answer #8 · answered by Moonboy 2 · 0 4

I think you just hate bush so much that you will slam your own country to put him down that's what I think about your failed policy crap!

2006-12-14 02:06:27 · answer #9 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 3 2

yes. pure and simple.

2006-12-14 02:10:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers