Isn't it amazing how these evolutionist tell us to not open our Bible, don't go there for answers. They want to cut off the very source of truth. Everytime I ask a question to stir thinking about evolution vs creation, they tell us to keep the Bible out of it.
What is wrong with these people, do they really think we will cut off communication from the only reliable source of truth just to please them? Your thoughts, tell us what your experience has been with these so called evolutionist?
2006-12-13 15:34:22 · 29 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I agree with you. They don't like the FACT that their "sciences" keep proving the Bible correct. As for the answer that creationism in not even a science,Neither is "evolution" it is still a "theory".So it HAS NOT been proved fact yet.I personally think (as should be obvious) that creationism is a lot more plausible than the conglomeration of infinite "accidents/co-incidents" that the evolutionist say have happened to create all that is. Although I do believe in the "Big Bang Theory", God spoke it and "Bang" there it was!!!! Genesis 1:1-2 KJV
2006-12-13 15:56:36 · answer #1 · answered by david b 4 · 1⤊ 10⤋
when you consider that I somewhat have responded all of those decrease and paste questions distinct circumstances, complete with an same typographical blunders, i will disprove your premise by answering one. The lungs advanced from the swim bladder, an outpouching of the digestive tract that advanced to furnish fish a way of regulating buoyancy. because the digestive tract is mucosa coated, the mucus membranes preceded the lungs. because the throat is an anatomic area no longer a structure, discussing it truly is evolution is unnecessary (even with the actual incontrovertible reality that the evolution of it truly is platforms is attractive). because the gasoline mix contained in the air isn't "acceptable", nor has it been consistent by the years, that in no way existed a lot less advanced. As you do not comprehend the position the typos are on your questions, you've shown that those who decrease and paste from Creationist web pages are as ignorant as they're dishonest.
2016-11-26 02:08:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the bible is no source of truth, it was written by MAN and has been altered countless times in the last two millenia to fit whatever perpose those in power required of it, the reason evolutionists (such as myself) dislike... no wait, better word... detest the use of the bible is the fact that it is a FICTION BOOK... it is the best selling fiction book of all time, and quite rightly so, it's the greatest story ever told, marvelous characters, some real good morals, but people forget that that is all it is, a fiction book made to corral people into the control of the churches. there is no such thing as a single reliable source of truth; you'll never hear me call evolution and the big bang perfect and/or 100% true but the botom line is that even 1% truth is better than the 0% truth of the bible...
...so endeth the rant... and before you say it, no, i am not closed minded, i have read the bible cover to cover several times, i have lived life as a christian for many years but i decided it was silly and i walked away.
if i'm going to hell, so be it, at least i'll be warm
2006-12-13 15:44:34 · answer #3 · answered by Austin Darkora 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
First of all the thing you have to understand is that it is both. The world had to be created in one way or another, but science clearly shows that creatures and humans do evolve over time. the reason they say to leave out the bible is because to some, the bible is not fact. It's merely a story book, or a set of guidelines for life. The thing you have to understand is that not everyone believes the exact same thing that you do, so whatever it is that shows you the truth, may be false to someone else. Different strokes for different folks.
2006-12-13 15:42:37 · answer #4 · answered by Elora 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm not exactly sure what you're looking for here, but I'll put in my two cents. I'm a firm believer in evolution and the Bible. There is undeniable evidence that it took billions of years to create the earth as we know it. (Notice I said "create"). My theory is that God created the laws of science, physics, etc., then put them into motion. He patiently sat back and watched. I even believe that a form of cave man evolved from this handiwork. But here's where I separate myself from the evolutionists - I firmly believe that God created man. Sure there was a cave man, but God created human man (and woman). Scientists have never found, and will never find, a link between cave man and God's man. Look at everything that's been discovered up until now - the skeletal progression from ape to cave man - all the pieces are there. But no one has ever found that one skeleton that links neanderthals to humans. And they never will.
So, yes, I believe in the evolution of virtually every species on earth. And I believe this evolution is the product of God. But He saved one species for His own special touch - man.
2006-12-13 16:00:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Exactly who are you to judge truth?
I think your God would be appalled by your mean-spirited narrowmindedness.
The question you posted after this only proves my point.
FRANKLY, Frank, judge not lest ye be judged. Time to get a reality check and stop blaming everyone else for making you miserable. I'm sure your God would prefer you out spreading tolerance than inciting anger.
2006-12-13 16:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by Me, Thrice-Baked 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, you say tha creation is the truth. Very simple.Creation is the truth because I say so,eh?
I think the Bible has some advantages because it does not require observation of reality.It does not require research of what has really happened. If reality, the observed facts and phenomena do go along with the Bible, ignore them!
The Bible is the truth because you say so!
2006-12-13 15:45:55 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. Sabetudo 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
After reading some of these answers ... above ...
And, as a Sasquatch of 700+ years in age ...
Humans seem (to me) to be a bunch of morons!
The Bible was given to us to teach us the way! Why? (How?) do does one figure this as wrong???
The Ol' Sasquatch Ü
2006-12-13 15:50:15 · answer #8 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LMFAO
They tell you to keep your Bible out of it because it's not the truth. Don't you get it? The Bible was written by a man, it's published by man, also reprinted by man. If The Bible was really God's gospel then why didn't he just create Bibles himself?
How about I ask you a question that your unlimited source of truth cannot answer.
If evolution isn't real, how do you explain the bones of these prehistoric humans?
http://contradictions.darwin.ws/htree.jpg
Pretty simple question, I think.
2006-12-13 15:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
It is because many think that supernatural things cannot be tested so therefore do not belong withen the boundaries of scientific thinking. If something happens which to most would appear supernatural, they will not even consider any evidence with a supernatural origen.
For example...If I were to be able, by some gift of God, show them a miracle to finally "prove" God's exhistance to them, short of seeing the face of God himself (an impossibility for any human to see and remain alive because if any were to see the face of God they would drop dead)....they would not believe.
They would NOT believe.
Ok what miracles would be options for me and them to choose?
Walk on water?
Time and date to the second when the next supernova would accur and point them directly to the star and say, "Ok, ready now? Ok look at that star. This is your evidence. Alpha Centari...3:26 pm and 21.54435 seconds, on such a such date. AND LOOK! *supernova occurs* ...see there ya go! There's your proof"..
They could not by their terms of science see it as supernatural. They cannot look at supernatural reasons to explain something like that occuring.
People of that mind set would then set out and spend the rest of their life trying to explain it using scientific terms. Years would pass and the memory would fade. They may even doubt that it occured at all. They may think it was mass hysteria, or perhaps that the star itself never exhisted at all, that perhaps it was a spacial anomaly that we "THOUGHT" was a star and my personal knowledge that it was going to explode was coincidence or some scientist somewhere performed some test that I had prior knowledge of the supernova. You can never prove God to someone who cannot look at supernatural things in scientific terms. Just won't happen because they are designed not to hear it.
2006-12-13 15:46:36 · answer #10 · answered by sheepinarowboat 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Ok, first of all, im a Christian and right now im typing up a paper on evolution and i would like you to read it. It describes my beliefs on the whole thing so im going to ask you if i can email it to you. Your not the first person i hear this from. my email is italian_crzy_dog@yahoo.com in case you were to lazy to click on my name and find out for yourself.
2006-12-13 15:40:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋