yes, it would be, so i am sure glad we are not in a fraudulent war, but a war approved by Congress, voted and agreed to by both parties.
So not sure what way you are talking about, maybe one of those in Africa ???
2006-12-13 14:41:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
lets see, all volunteer military...and we started heading over there in bulk in 2001?
what time is it now?
2007 almost?
isnt there about a 6 year cap on enlistment packages to begin with?
sorry, i have trouble with the logic that there are any amount of 'innocent' military personell.
I find that to be a degrading terminology to put on someone who by this time, if they honestly didnt believe in it or want to be a part of it would be out of it by now.
I think you are one of those pathetic cowards that wants to wash your hands of involvement by displaying an 'innocent' attitude of your own. An aggressive defense for a personal weakness.
I think you probably just need a good @$$ kicking is all.
2006-12-13 14:58:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by jorluke 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I guess you would rather fight terrorism at home. There was not a draft ever person is over there because they joined to fight for our country. It is like terrible that our troops are dying but police die every day, firefighters die due to arsonist, it is exactly the same as a military member dying.
2006-12-13 14:52:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by iseemen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No! Is having the opportunity to have Osama Bin Laden handed to you by the Pakistan government before 9/11, but refusing to take him murder. Clinton knew what Bin Laden was capable of. I served while Clinton was in office and I often briefed on Bin Laden. I can't believe Clinton didn't take him when he had the opportunity. But that's life.
2006-12-13 14:44:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by jay r 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
People in the military are not the simple minded dolts that John Kerry would have you believe. They know what they are getting into and most that have been in country believe in what the US is trying to accomplish.
2006-12-13 14:57:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by k3s793 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you have completely neglected it. that's not as though God despatched some somewhat, somewhat sturdy guy. God despatched His in basic terms begotten Son, who's additionally God. this is a element of the Doctrine of the Trinity. Jesus is the understand God. the daddy is the God Head. And the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of God. Jesus has executed no longer something which the daddy did no longer enable, nor has the daddy allowed something Jesus did no longer consent to. the assumption right that's that there are 3 separate persons of a million God being. they are in unity and that they are finished and appropriate. it may be extra like your Soul sending your physique to die for yet another. This somewhat occurs plenty. we are so trapped in our Carnal thinking we don't understand that we are made in basic terms like God. we've a Soul (Self unsleeping), a Spirit (God unsleeping) and a physique (international unsleeping). we are 3 separate persons, yet we are no longer unified in our thinking. because of the fact of this we are able to be divided approximately some thing. The physique needs it one way and the Spirit needs it yet another... and nonetheless our Soul would desire to wish some thing different... yet we (our Souls) would desire to % who wins. Very hardly are we ever totally given to a minimum of one way or yet another. So your reasoning, as I see it, relies upon a failed assumption. as a result your end is faulty. God somewhat despatched Himself because of the fact there are no longer any physique else who would desire to shop guy. guy would desire to no longer do it... on no account. the part of the regulation (this is the understand God... aka. Jesus) became given to guy so as that guy would desire to be attentive to that he (guy) became responsible of breaking God's regulation. as a replace of wanting all of mankind to parish, God took it upon Himself to die so as that no could parish. although, in basic terms people who've died with Christ would additionally be risen with Christ and take transport of a sparkling existence and nature.
2016-12-11 08:44:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fighting a wrong war could be treated as a wrong order from the Commander-in-Chief. Thus, if there is evidence to prove this allegation, an impeachment case could be initiated against the President.
2006-12-13 14:46:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
is killing 75 million Innocent babes.
2006-12-13 14:44:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
"Innocent military personnel?" You do realize that the military is voluntary, don't you? They kind of know what they are getting into...
2006-12-13 14:42:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Your question is based on a falsehood.
That makes a real answer impossible.
read & learn
http://usawakeup.org
2006-12-13 14:47:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋