bush doesnt even know
2006-12-13 14:09:14 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
simply to keep the new Iraq government stable. If US troops do withdraw now the new Iraqi government elected BY THE IRAQI PEOPLE will be easily overthrown and Iraq will be in a civil war just because the US couldnt be stuffed finnishing the job there. mind you I am actuly against the war and think we sould of never gotten involved but because we are now there anyway it is OUR DUTY to help the Iraqi people because we got them in this mess and we would just make it worse by leaving.
2006-12-13 14:22:30 · answer #1 · answered by Juzzy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question, if you live under a rock. Watch the news, and you will see that there is a little thing called an insurgency, which happen to blow up cars every couple of hours. There is very little of an army to keep the civilians safe.
Oh, and there were biological weapons, or wmds-mass destruction, not necessarily nukes.Nice try.Iran is next door, and they would love it if we left tommorow. See what the new congress decides. No one thinks running away is a good plan, because we would look like morons, and yes even more so than now in most minds. This is political war just as much as a military one, there is no right answer for what to do. But listen to most politicians, running away will come back to haunt us.
By the way, Saddam was sentenced to DIE because he killed thousands, but who's counting. He gassed his own countrymen, oh but that doesn't matter. Nice
2006-12-13 14:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by the angry elephant 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
somebody else who in problem-free words listens to 0.5 of the tale and makes up something. McCain doesn't favor to keep the Iraq warfare going for 100 years. He in no way reported that. He in no way implied that. it truly is purely made up. He did say that there will be troops in Iraq for 100 years yet he has never even inspired that. He purely reported the risk once. i love how human beings attempt to tie Bush and McCain to grease organizations yet continually ignore that Al Gore's fortune all got here from oil. Neither Bush nor McCain choose the warfare to very last 100 years. they have both noted as for the troops to be bumped off once achievable yet Bush did not favor to set a time table with out the Iraqi enter. Now that the Iraqi's are waiting to take over, the Bush administration has been discussing the timetable with them. the US public voted out the "Rubberstamp Republicans" in 2006 and particularly were given a set of Democrats which have persevered to fund the warfare they were supposedly adversarial to with out question. a good type of excellent it did.
2016-11-26 02:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by schwan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no mission in Iraq, but to do as little as possible, so as NOT to stop the sectarian strife. By allowing the violence to continue between various factions in Iraq we perpetuate our need to be there in the public mind, which in turn allows our contractors, both defense and civilian, to earn wealth. These contractors happen to be closely affiliated with Bush and his political cohorts. Our continued occupation of Iraq is propelled at the behest of corporate America, not by any sincere desire to save the lives of our troops or to instill democracy in a once despotic nation.
2006-12-14 04:58:29 · answer #4 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq has a government framework, just as you have a framework for an idea. Now the project is to fill it out. There's reasonable hope that with training and equipment the government can be filled out enough to be viable. With additional knowledge of international relationsand governmental and military affairs, and with additional contemplation......
2006-12-13 19:26:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It changes daily, did you forget? 1st it was because of nukes, which weren't there!!!! Then it was because of Sadam, then it was to establish a democracy in Iraq. I think the mission is to keep gas prices up so the oil fields that the Bushes own can drag in as much money as possible until his term is up. Further more, Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11, if you recall, Sadam was on the TV the very next day saying he had nothing to do with it, because he knew Bush had a personal vendena against him. And it is common knowledge that those attacks came from Afghanistan and Bush has still done nothing to vindicate what happened on that day. Afghanistan remains untouched.
2006-12-13 14:14:13 · answer #6 · answered by Kissmy b 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Their mission now is to get in the middle of a civil war so there is a common enemy between both the sunnis and shites. The US then gets shot at and everyone there is happy instead of fighting eachother which is what will happen eventually.
2006-12-13 14:18:19 · answer #7 · answered by michael p 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well in theory it is to fix the mess we created. Bush went into a country whose very religion is not democratic and tried to change it. It's because of cultural ignorance (and more than likely oil from the middle east) that we are still there and digging ourselves in to a deeper hole every day.
2006-12-15 06:46:10 · answer #8 · answered by //// 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'll have to direct your question to the Israeli government - that's who is directing the US war in Afghanistan and Iraq.
2006-12-14 05:55:39 · answer #9 · answered by Misanthrope 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no mission thats y they need to bring the troops home people r still losing their loved ones over there and for what?
2006-12-13 14:12:30 · answer #10 · answered by A soldiers wife 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋